Starting with learning: New approaches to development and improvement planning in primary schools

Research Papers in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 302-322

  Broadhead, Pat ^a   Cuckle, Pat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Development planning; Primary; Pupil learning; School improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645675052     PISSN: 02671522     EISSN: 14701146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02671520210153023     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BASTIANI, J. (2000). Changing the curriculum: a practical agenda. London: RSA.
2. BAYLISS, V. (1999). Opening Minds. Education for the 21st Century. London: RSA.
3. BAYLISS, V. (2000). What should our children learn? Issues around a new curriculum. London: RSA.
4. BROADHEAD, P. CUCKLE, P. HODGSON, J. and DUNFORD, J. (1996). ‘Improving primary schools through school development planning. Building a vision, exploring a reality’, Educational Management and Administration. 24, 3, 277-90.
5. BROADHEAD, P. HODGSON, J. CUCKLE, P. and DUNFORD, J. (1998). ‘School development planning: moving from the amorphous to the dimensional and making it your own’, Research Papers in Education. 13, 1, 3-18.
6. BROADHEAD, P. CUCKLE, P. and HODGSON, J. (1999). ‘Promoting pupil learning within a school development framework’, Research Papers in Education, 14, 3, 275-94.
7. BRUNEL UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC POLICY and PRACTICE HELIX CONSULTING GROUP (1999). The OFSTED system of School Inspection: an independent evaluation. Report Commissioned by the Office for Standards in Inspection. Uxbridge: OFSTIN.
8. CAMPBELL, J. and NEILL, S.R. St J. (1994). Primary Teachers at Work. London: Routledge.
9. CASE, P., CASE, S. and CATLING, S. (2000). ‘Please Show You’re Working: a critical assessment of the impact of OFSTED inspection on primary teachers’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21,2, 605-21.
10. CLARK A. and MOSS, P (2001). Listening to young children: the Mosaic approach. National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
11. CONNOLLY, F.M., CLANDININ, D.J. and HE, M.F. (1997). ‘Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 7, 665-74.
12. CUCKLE, P. HODGSON, J. and BROADHEAD, P. (1998a). ‘Investigating the relationship between OFSTED Inspections and School Development Planning’, School Leadership and Management, 18, 2, 271-83.
13. CUCKLE, P. BROADHEAD, P. HODGSON, J. and DUNFORD, J. (1998b). ‘Development Planning in Primary Schools: A Positive Influence on Management and Culture’, Educational Management and Administration, 26, 2, 185-95.
14. DAVIES, B. and ELLISON, L. (1998). ‘Strategic Planning in Schools: an oxymoron’, School Leadership and Management, 18, 4, 461-73.
15. FITZ-GIBBON, C.T. and STEPHENSON-FORSTER, N.J. (1999). ‘Is OFSTED helpful?’ In: Cullingford, C. (Ed.) (1999). An Inspector Calls. OFSTED and its effects on school standards. London: Kogan Page.
16. HARGREAVES, D., HOPKINS, D., LEASK, M., CONNOLY, J. and ROBINSON, P. (1989). Planning for School Development: Advice to Governors, Headteachers and Teachers. London: DES.
17. HARGREAVES, D. and HOPKINS, D. with LEASK, M. (1991). The Empowered School: The Management and Practice of Development Planning. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
18. FULLAN, M. and HARGREAVES, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for in your school? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19. HOLLY, P. and SOUTHWORTH, G. (1989). The Developing School. Lewes: Falmer.
20. HOPKINS, D., BERESFORD, J. and WEST, M. (1998). ‘Creating the conditions for classroom and teacher development’, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4, 1, 115-41.
21. HOPKINS, D. and LEVIN, B. (2000). ‘Government Policy and School Development’, School Leadership and Management, 20, 1, 15-30.
22. HUBERMANN, M. (1992). ‘Critical introduction to M. Fullan’, Successful School Improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
23. JEFFREY, B. and WOODS, P. (1998). Testing Teachers. London: Falmer Press.
24. MacGILCHRIST, B., MORTIMORE, P., SAVAGE, J. and BERESFORD, C. (1995). Planning Matters: The Impact of Development Planning on Primary Schools. London: Paul Chapman.
25. POLLARD, A. (1987) ‘Studying Children’s Perspectives: a collaborative approach’. In: WALFORD, G. (Ed.) Doing Sociology of Education. Lewes: Falmer Press.
26. REEVES, J. (2000). ‘Tracking the Links between Pupil attainment and Development Planning’, School Leadership and Management, 20, 3, 315-32.
27. RIDDELL, S., BROWN, S. and DUFFIELD, J. (1998). ‘The Utility of Qualitative Research for Influencing policy and Practice on School Effectiveness’. In: SLEE, R. and WEINER, G. with TOMLINSON, S. (Eds) School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movement. London: Falmer Press.
28. RUDDOCK, J., CHAPLAIN, R. and WALLACE, G. (1996). School Improvement: What Can Pupils Tell Us? London: David Fulton.
29. SOUTHWORTH, G. (1994). ‘The learning school’. In: RIBBENS, P. and BURRIDGE, E. (Eds) Improving Education: promoting quality in schools. London: Cassell.
30. SOUTHWORTH, G. (1996). ‘Improving Primary Schools: shifting the emphasis and clarifying the focus’, School Organisation, 16, 3, 263-80.
31. WALLACE, M. (1989). ‘Planning for multiple change in the primary school’, Education 3-13 13-17.
32. WALLACE, M. (1991). ‘Coping with multiple innovations in school: an exploratory study’, Educational Management and Administration, 19, 3, 180-92.
33. WEBB, R. (1993). Eating the elephant Bit by Bit: the National Curriculum at Key Stage 2. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
34. WEBB, R. (1994). After the Deluge: changing roles and responsibilities in the primary school. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.