The cognitive processes underlying cultivation effects are a function of whether the judgments are on-line or memory-based

Communications

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 327-344

  Shrum, L J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Ability to process; Cultivation; Demographic measures versus value measures; Memory based judgments; Motivation to process; On line judgments

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645636313     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/comm.2004.021     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In. R. S. Wyer (Eds.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
2. Brehm, J. W. (1972). Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
3. Burroughs, J. E., Shrum, L. J., and Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Does television viewing promote materialism? Cultivating American perceptions of the good life. In S. Broniarczyk and K.Nakamoto (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 28, pp. 442-443). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research
4. Busselle, R. W. (2001). The role of exemplar accessibility in social reality judgments. Media Psychology, 3, 43-67
5. Busselle, R. W. and Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and the accessibility of social information. Media Psychology, 5, 255-282
6. Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97-109
7. Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., and Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253
9. Carlston, D. E. (1980). The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 303-328
10. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., and Eagly, A. H. (1987). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press
11. Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich
12. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., and Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71, 390-405
13. Fox, W. S. and Philliber, W. W. (1978). Television viewing and the perception of affluence. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 103-112
14. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Eleey, M. F., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., and Signorielli, N. (1977). TV violence profile no. 8: The highlights. Journal of Communication, 27(2),171-180
15. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., and Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: Violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 176-207
16. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10-29
17. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
18. Hastie, R. and Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268
19. Hawkins, R. P. and Pingree, S. (1982). Television's influence on constructions of social reality. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, and J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2, pp. 224-247). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office
20. Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., and Adler, I. (1987). Searching for cognitive processes in the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 13, 553-577
21. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press
22. Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., and Lombardi, W. (1985). The nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59-69
23. Higgins, E. T. and King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor and J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 69-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
24. Hirsch, P. (1980). The scary world of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al's findings on cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403-456
25. Hirschman, E. C. (1988). The ideology of consumption: A structural syntactical analysis of 'Dallas' and 'Dynasty'. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 344-359
26. Hughes, M. (1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects oftelevision watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287-302
27. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press
28. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A.Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press
29. Lichtenstein, M. and Srull, T. K. (1987). Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93-118
30. Lingle, J. H. and Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 180-194
31. Manis, M., Shedler, J., Jonides, J., and Nelson, T. E. (1993). Availability heuristic in judgments of set size and frequency of occurrence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 448-457
32. Mares, M. L. (1996). The role of source confusions in television's cultivation of social reality judgments. Human Communication Research, 23, 278-297
33. Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. (1980). Human inferences: Strategies and shortcomings of human judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
34. O'Guinn, T. C. and Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278-294
35. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag
36. Pfau, M., Mullen, L. J., and Garrow, K. (1995). The influence of television viewing on public perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 441-458
37. Potter, W. J. (1991). Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective. Communication Research, 18, 92-113
38. Richins, M. L. and Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Conswner Research, 19, 303-316
39. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press
40. nd ed., pp. 525-548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
41. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., and Taylor, D. S. (1988). A methodological examination of cultivation. Communication Research, 15, 107-134
42. Shapiro, M. A. (1991). Memory and decision processes in the construction of social ,reality. Communication Research, 18, 3-24
43. Shedler, J. and Manis, M. (1986). Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 26-36
44. Sherman, S. J. and Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 189-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
45. Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402-429
46. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 482-509
47. Shrum, L. J. (1999). The effect of data-collection method on the cultivation effect: Implications for the heuristic processing model of cultivation effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA
48. Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 94-120
49. nd ed., pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
50. Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., and Rindfleisch, A. (2004a). A process model of consumer cultivation: The role of television is a function of the type of judgment. In L. J. Shrum(Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
51. Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., and Rindfleisch, A. (2004b). Television's cultivation of materialism: Effects and underlying processes. Manuscript under review
52. Shrum, L. J. and O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471
53. Shrum, L. J., O'Guinn, T. C., Semenik, R. J., and Faber, R. J. (1991). Processes and effects in the construction of normative consumer beliefs: The role of television. In R. H. Holman and M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 18, pp. 755-763). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research
54. Shrum, L. J., Wyer, R. S., and O'Guinn, T. C. (1998). The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 447-458
55. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic forjudging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232
56. Volgy, T. and Schwarz, J. (1980). Television entertainment programming and sociopolitical attitudes. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 150-155
57. Wyer, R. S. and Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychological Review, 106, 89-118
58. Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., and Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Mental models for brand placement. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 79-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum