An improved capacity spectrum method for ATC-40

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 13, 2003, Pages 2013-2025

  Lin, Yu Yuan ^a   Chang, Kuo Chun ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Absolute acceleration; Capacity spectrum method; Equivalent linear systems; Pseudo acceleration

Indexed keywords

CONTROL NONLINEARITIES; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RETROFITTING;

CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHODS;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0242349658     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.312     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996.
2. Freeman SA, Nicoletti JP, Tyrell JV. Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk-A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. Proceedings of the 1st U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1975; 113-122.
3. Freeman SA. Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion. Publ. SP-55, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 589-605, 1978.
4. Freeman SA. Development and use of capacity spectrum method. Paper No. 269. The 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering/EERI, Seattle, Washington, 31 May-4 June, 1998.
5. Deierlein GG, Hsieh SH. Seismic response of steel frames with semi-rigid connections using the capacity spectrum method. Proceedings of the 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 2: 863-872, 1990.
6. Reinhorn AM, Li C, Constantinou MC. Experimental and analytical investigations of seismic retrofit of structures with supplemental damping. Report No. NCEER-95-0001, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, 1995.
7. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1999.
8. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126(4):482-490.
9. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:979-993.
10. Jennings PC. Equivalent viscous damping for yielding structures. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1968; 94(EMI):103-116.
11. Gulkan P, Sozen M. Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions. ACI Journal 1974; 71:604-610.
12. Shibata A. Sozen M. Substitute structure method for seismic design in R/C. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1976; 102:1-18.
13. Iwan WD, Gates NC. Estimating earthquake response of simple hysteretic structures. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1979; 105(EM3):391-405.
14. Clough RW, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1993.
15. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1995.
16. Jacobsen LS. Damping in composite structures. Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1960; II:1029-1044.
17. Berg GV. A study of the earthquake response of inelastic systems. Proceedings of the 34th Convention of the Structural Engineering Association of California, Coronado, 63-67, 1965.
18. Reddy CK, Pratap R. Equivalent viscous damping for a bilinear hysteretic oscillator. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126(11):1189-1196.
19. Xue Q. Assessing the accuracy of the damping model used in displacement-based seismic demand evaluation and design of inelastic structures. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2001, submitted.
20. WJE. Seismic dynamic analysis for building. Final manuscript prepared for the U.S. Army Engineering Division by Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., Emeryville, California, 1996.
21. Kowalsky MJ, Priestley MJN, MacRae GA. Displacement-based design, a methodology for seismic design applied to SDOF reinforced concrete structures. Report No. SSRP-94/16, Structural System Research Project, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 1994.
22. Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielson NN. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1970; 96:2557-2573.