Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 55-63

  Plucker, Jonathan A ^a,d   Runco, Mark A ^b   Lim, Woong ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Korea National University of Education   (South Korea)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645505788     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amabile, T. M. (in press). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (rev. ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
2. Basadur, M., & Finkbeiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 37-49.
3. Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 21-32.
4. Basadur, M., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 166-173.
5. Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality & Individual Differences, 14, 155-162.
6. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
8. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Ltd.
10. Hallman, R. J. (1970). Toward a Hindu theory of creativity. Educational Theory, 20, 368-376.
11. Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to be creative on the psychological meaning of divergent test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
12. Jay, E., & Perkins, D. (1997). Creativity's compass: A review of problem finding. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
13. Kristeller, P. O. (1983)."Creativity" and "tradition. " Journal of the History of Ideas, 44, 105-114.
14. Lim, W., & Plucker, J. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115-130.
15. Lim, W., Plucker, J. A., & Im, K. (2002). We're more alike than we think we are: Implicit theories of intelligence with a Korean sample. Intelligence, 30, 185-208.
16. Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281.
18. MacKinnon, D. W. (1983). The highly effective individual. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: A social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 114-127). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
19. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
20. Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
22. Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45-53.
23. Plucker, J. (2002). What's in a name? Young adolescents' implicit conceptions of invention. Science Education, 86, 149-160.
24. Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.
25. Plucker, J., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Plucker, J., & Runco, M. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.
27. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
28. Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417-430.
29. Runco, M. A. (1986). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 308-315.
30. Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children's art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177-189
31. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1991a). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Runco, M. A. (1991b). The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311-319.
33. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Runco, M. A. (1999a). Divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 577-582). San Diego, CA: Academic.
35. Runco, M. A. (1999b). Implicit theories. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 27-30). San Diego, CA: Academic.
36. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (Eds.). (1990). Theories of creativity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243-267.
38. Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537-546.
39. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D., & Gaynor, J. R. (1999). The judgmental bases of creativity and implications for the study of gifted youth. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 113-141). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
40. Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400.
41. Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.
42. Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children's ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 439-452.
43. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.). (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Torrance, E. P. (1970). Creative learning and teaching. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
46. Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
47. Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. (1969). The talented student. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.