Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 393-400

  Runco, Mark A ^a,b   Plucker, Jonathan A ^c   Lim, Woong ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039931702     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3. Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 115-126.
4. Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1993). Assessing creative products: Progress and potentials. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestein, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 331-349). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 158-178.
6. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30-43). New York: Wiley.
7. Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110-118.
8. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Hargreaves, D. J., Galton, M. J., & Robinson, S. (1996). Teachers' assessments of primary children's classroom work in the creative arts. Educational Research, 38, 199-211.
10. Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193-208.
11. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 11-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464.
13. Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33, 309-329.
14. Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311-366.
15. Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1972). Creative ability over a five year span. Child Development, 43, 427-433.
16. Lindauer, M. S. (1990). Reactions to cheap art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 95-110.
17. Lindauer, M. S. (1991). Comparisons between museum and mass-produced art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 11-22.
18. Lindauer, M. S. (1993). The span of creativity among long-lived historical artists. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 221-239.
19. MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, NY: The Creative Education Foundation.
20. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis for the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
21. Milgram, R. (in press). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (Rev. ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
22. Mraz, W., & Runco, M. A. (1994). Suicide ideation and creative problem solving. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 24, 38-47.
23. O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267-278.
24. Plucker, J. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958-present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.
25. Plucker, J., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128-134.
27. Rogers, C. (1961). Toward a theory of creativity. In On becoming a person (pp. 347-359). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Runco, M. A. (1986a). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375-384.
29. Runco, M. A. (1986b). Predicting children's creative performance. Psychological Reports, 59, 1247-1254.
30. Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children's art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177-189.
31. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Runco, M. A. (in press). Divergent thinking and creative ideation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
33. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.
34. Runco, M. A., & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 166-173.
35. Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svensen, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.
36. Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
37. Simonton, D. K. (in press). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (Rev. ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
38. Taylor, D. W. (1960). Thinking and creativity. Annals of New York Academy of the Sciences, 91, 108-127.
39. Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
40. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-252.
41. Treffinger, D. J. (1989). Student invention evaluation kit: Field test edition. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
42. Treffinger, D. J., & Poggio, J. P. (1972). Needed research on the measurement of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 253-267.
43. Wallach, M. A. (1976, January-February). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist, 64(1), 57-63.
44. Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The talented student: A validation of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
45. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
46. Westberg, K. L. (1991). The effects of instruction in the inventing process on students' development of inventions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51. (University Microfilms No. 9107625)