The potential role of breast ductoscopy in breast cancer screening

International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 208-211

  Al Sarakbi, W ^c   Escobar, Pedro F ^a   Mokbel, Kefah ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Breast; Cancer; Ductoscopy; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISCHARGE; BREAST DUCT; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER SCREENING; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BREAST TUMOR; ENDOSCOPY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; MAMMARY GLAND; METHODOLOGY; NIPPLE; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; NIPPLES; RISK ASSESSMENT; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 33645460431     PISSN: 1534892X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, et al: Cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 53:5-26, 2003.
2. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al: Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089-1096, 1998.
3. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524-3531, 2001.
4. Mokbel K, Elkak AE: The evolving role of mammary ductoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin 18:30-32, 2002.
5. Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, et al: Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21:188-193, 1991.
6. Mokbel K, Escobar PF, Matsunaga T: Mammary ductoscopy: current status and future prospects. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:3-8, 2005.
7. Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misaka T, et al: Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer 8:213-221, 2001.
8. Dooley WC, Francescatti D, Clark L, et al: Office-based breast ductoscopy for diagnosis. Am J Surg 188:415-418, 2004.
9. Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Hirata K: Recent progress of image diagnosis for breast cancer: ductoscopy of the breast. Jpn J Breast Cancer 97(5):357-362, 1996.
10. Wellings SR, Jensen HM, Marcum RG: An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 55:231-273, 1975.
11. Going JJ, Moffat DF: Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions. J Pathol 203:538-544, 2004.
12. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Babb J, et al: Biological markers of risk in nipple aspirate fluid are associated with residual cancer and tumour size. Br J Cancer 81:1222-1227, 1999.
13. Matsunaga T, Kawakami Y, Namba K, et al: Intraductal biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Cancer 101:2164-2169, 2004.
14. Sauter ER, Klein-Szanto A, Ehya H, et al: Ductoscopic cytology and image analysis to detect breast carcinoma. Cancer 101:1283-1292, 2004.
15. Badve S, Wiley E, Rodriguez N: Assessment of utility of ductal lavage and ductoscopy in breast cancer-a retrospective analysis of mastectomy specimens. Mod Pathol 16:206-209, 2003.
16. Burak WE, Jr, Agnese DM, Povoski SP: Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision. Cancer 98:1369-1376, 2003.
17. Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, et al: Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1624-1632, 2001.
18. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Schlatter L, et al: Ductoscopic cytology to detect breast cancer. Cancer 10:33-41; discussion 15-16, 2004.
19. Mokbel K, Elkak AE: Magnetic resonance imaging for screening of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:4184, 2001.
20. Pawlik TM, Fritsche H, Coombes KR, et al: Significant differences in nipple aspirate fluid protein expression between healthy women and those with breast cancer demonstrated by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:149-157, 2005.
21. Zou Y, Guo Z: A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection. Med Eng Phys 25:79-90, 2003.
22. Salhab M, Al Sarakbi W, Mokbel K: The evolving role of the dynamic thermal analysis in the early detection of breast cancer. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2:8, 2005.