Ductoscopic cytology and image analysis to detect breast carcinoma

Cancer

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1283-1292

  Sauter, Edward R ^a   Klein Szanto, Andres ^b   Ehya, Hormoz ^b   MacGibbon, Brenda ^c  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Breast ductoscopy; Cytology; Image analysis

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCTOSCOPY; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TETRAPLOIDY;

ANEUPLOIDY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4444310292     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20524     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:5-26.
2. Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1991;21:188-193.
3. Teboul M. A new concept in breast investigation: echohistological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. Biomed Pharmacother. 1988;42:289-295.
4. Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer. 2000;89:1512-1519.
5. Berna JD, Garcia-Medina V, Kuni CC. Ductoscopy: a new technique for ductal exploration. Eur J Radiol 1991;12:127-129.
6. Dooley WC. Endoscopic visualization of breast tumors. JAMA. 2000;284:1518.
7. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Schlatter L, MacGibbon B. Ductoscopic cytology to detect breast cancer. Cancer J. 2004;10:33-41.
8. Sauter ER, Ross E, Daly M, et al. Nipple aspirate fluid: a promising non-invasive method to identify cellular markers of breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:494-501.
9. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Babb J, et al. Biological markers of risk in nipple aspirate fluid are associated with residual cancer and tumour size. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1222-1227.
10. Sauter ER, Daly M, Linahan K, et al. Prostate-specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:967-970.
11. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Mammen A, Klein G. Nipple aspirate cytology and pathologic parameters predict residual cancer and nodal involvement after excisional breast biopsy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:1952-1957.
12. Sudbo J, Kildal W, Risberg B, Koppang HS, Danielsen HE, Reith A. DNA content as a prognostic marker in patients with oral leukoplakia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1270-1278.
13. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
14. SAS. SAS STAT user's guide. Gary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.
15. Agresti A, Wackerly D, Boyett JM. Exact conditional tests for cross-classification: approximation of attained significance level. Psychometrika. 1979;44:75-83.
16. Agresti A. A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Stat Sci. 1992;7:131-177.
17. Dinkel HP, Gassei AM, Muller T, Lourens S, Rominger M, Tschammler A. Galactography and exfoliative cytology in women with abnormal nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:625-629.
18. Franceschi D, Crowe J, Zollinger R, et al. Biopsy of the breast for mammographically detected lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;171:449-455.
19. Badve S, Wiley E, Rodriguez N. Assessment of utility of ductal lavage and ductoscopy in breast cancer-a retrospective analysis of mastectomy specimens. Mod Pathol 2003; 16;206-209.
20. Syed S, Rowinsky E. The new generation of targeted therapies for breast cancer. Oncology (Huntingt), 2003;17:1339-1351; discussion 52, 55-56.
21. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, Miike R, et al. Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93; 1791-1798.