Ductoscopic cytology to detect breast cancer

Cancer Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-41

  Sauter, Edward R ^a,b   Ehya, Hormoz ^a,c   Schlatter, Lisa ^a,b   MacGibbon, Brenda ^a,d  

^a Ellis Fischel Cancer Center ^*

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

^c FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cytology; Ductoscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; ENDOSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERPLASIA; PAPILLOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; EXUDATE; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; METHODOLOGY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; ENDOSCOPY; EXUDATES AND TRANSUDATES; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 3442900831     PISSN: 15289117     EISSN: 1540336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200401000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A et al. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:5-26.
2. Papanicolaou GN, Holmquist DG, Bader GM et al. Exfoliative cytology of the human mammary gland and its value in the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases of the breast. Cancer 1958;11:377-409.
3. King BL, Crisi GM, Tsai SC et al. Immunocytochemical analysis of breast cells obtained by ductal lavage. Cancer 2002;96:244-249.
4. Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1991;21:188-193.
5. Teboul M. A new concept in breast investigation: echo-histological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. Biomed Pharmacother 1988;42:289-295.
6. Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 2000;89:1512-1519.
7. Berna JD, Garcia-Medina V, Kuni CC. Ductoscopy: a new technique for ductal exploration. Eur J Radiol 1991;12:127-129.
8. Dooley WC. Endoscopic visualization of breast tumors. JAMA 2000;284:1518.
9. Sauter ER, Ehya H, Babb J et al. Biological markers of risk in nipple aspirate fluid are associated with residual cancer and tumour size. Br J Cancer 1999;81:1222-1227.
10. Sauter ER, Daly M, Linahan K et al. Prostate-specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:967-970.
11. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1990.
12. SAS. SAS STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.
13. Agresti A, Wackerly D, Boyett JM. Exact conditional tests for cross-classification: approximation of attained significance level. Psychometrika 1979;44:75-83.
14. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12:153-157.
15. Franceschi D, Crowe J, Zollinger R et al. Biopsy of the breast for mammographically detected lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:449-455.
16. Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Ordonez NG et al. Characterization of foam cells in nipple aspirate fluid. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:261-264; discussion 265.
17. Damiani S, Cattani MG, Buonamici L et al. Mammary foam cells: characterization by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Virchows Arch 1998;432:433-440.