Proteasome and transcription: A destroyer goes into construction

BioEssays

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 235-239

  Hegde, Ashok N ^a   Upadhya, Sudarshan C ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE; PROTEASOME; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SAGA; UBIQUITIN;

PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASES; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 33645389088     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20379     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Lee D, Ezhkova E, Li B, Pattenden SG, Tansey WP, et al. 2005. The Proteasome regulatory particle alters the SAGA coactivator to enhance its interactions with transcriptional activators. Cell 123:423-436.
2. Mellor J. 2005. The dynamics of chromatin remodeling at promoters. Mol Cell 19:147-157.
3. Tjian R, Maniatis T. 1994. Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces. Cell 77:5-8.
4. Glickman MH, Clechanover A. 2002. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 82:373-428.
5. Hegde AN. 2004. Ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated local protein degradation and synaptic plasticity. Prog Neurobiol 73:311-357.
6. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. 1996. Structure and functions of the 20S and 265 proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 65:801-847.
7. Richmond C, Gorbea C, Rechsteiner M. 1997. Specific interactions between ATPase subunits of the 26 S protease. J Biol Chem 272:13403-13411.
8. Hofmann K, Bucher P. 1998. The PCI domain: a common theme in three multiprotein complexes. Trends Biochem Sci 23:204-205.
9. Ciechanover A, DiGiuseppe JA, Bercovich B, Orian A, Richter JD, et al. 1991. Degradation of nuclear oncoproteins by the ubiquitin system in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:139-143.
10. Shen R, Chen M, Wang YJ, Kaneki H, Xing L, et al. 2005. Smad6 interacts with Runx2 and mediates Smurf1-induced Runx2 degradation. J Biol Chem (Epub ahead of print).
11. Upadhya SC, Smith TK, Hegde AN. 2004. Ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated CREB repressor degradation during induction of long-term facilitation. J Neurochem 91:210-219.
12. Sundqvist A, goechea-Alonso MT, Ye X, Lukiyanchuk V, Jin J, et al. 2005. Control of lipid metabolism by phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the SREBP family of transcription factors by SCF(Fbw7). Cell Metab 1:379-391.
13. Ungureanu D, Silvennoinen O. 2005. SLIM trims STATs: ubiquitin E3 ligases provide insights for specificity in the regulation of cytokine signaling. Sci STKE 2005:e49.
14. Lingbeck JM, Trausch-Azar JS, Ciechanover A, Schwartz AL. 2005. E12 and E47 modulate cellular localization and proteasome-mediated degradation of MyoD and Id1. Oncogene 24:6376-6384.
15. Hoecker U. 2005. Regulated proteolysis in light signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:469-476.
16. Lonard DM, Nawaz Z, Smith CL, O'Malley BW. 2000. The 26S proteasome is required for estrogen receptor-alpha and coactivator turnover and for efficient estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation. Mol Cell 5:939-948.
17. Salghetti SE, Muratani M, Wijnen H, Futcher B, Tansey WP. 2000. Functional overlap of sequences that activate transcription and signal ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3118-3123.
18. Salghetti SE, Gaudy AA, Chenoweth JG, Tansey WP. 2001. Regulation of transcriptional activation domain function by ubiquitin. Science 293:1651-1653.
19. Kim SY, Herbst A, Tworkowski KA, Salghetti SE, Tansey WP. 2003. Skp2 regulates Myc protein stability and activity. Mol Cell 11:1177-1188.
20. von der LN, Johansson S, Wu S, Bahram F, Castell A, et al. 2003. The F-box protein Skp2 participates in c-Myc proteosomal degradation and acts as a cofactor for c-Myc-regulated transcription. Mol Cell 11:1189-1200.
21. Lipford JR, Smith GT, Chi Y, Deshaies RJ. 2005. A putative stimulatory role for activator turnover in gene expression. Nature 438:113-116.
22. Chen J, Archer TK. 2005. Regulating SWI/SNF subunit levels via protein-protein interactions and proteasomal degradation: BAF155 and BAF170 limit expression of BAF57. Mol Cell Biol 25:9016-9027.
23. Gillette TG, Gonzalez F, Delahodde A, Johnston SA, Kodadek T. 2004. Physical and functional association of RNA polymerase II and the proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:5904-5909.
24. Ferdous A, Gonzalez F, Sun L, Kodadek T, Johnston SA. 2001. The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 7:981-991.
25. Gonzalez F, Delahodde A, Kodadek T, Johnston SA. 2002. Recruitment of a 19S proteasome subcomplex to an activated promoter. Science 296:548-550.
26. Ferdous A, Kodadek T, Johnston SA. 2002. A nonproteolytic function of the 19S regulatory subunit of the 26S proteasome is required for efficient activated transcription by human RNA polymerase II. Biochemistry 41:12798-12805.
27. Morris MC, Kaiser P, Rudyak S, Baskerville C, Watson MH, et al. 2003. Cks1-dependent proteasome recruitment and activation of CDC20 transcription in budding yeast. Nature 423:1009-1013.
28. Ezhkova E, Tansey WP. 2004. Proteasomal ATPases link ubiquitylation of histone H2B to methylation of histone H3. Mol Cell 13:435-442.
29. Aravind L, Ponting CP. 1998. Homologues of 26S proteasome subunits are regulators of transcription and translation. Protein Sci 7:1250-1254.
30. Upadhya SC, Ding L, Smith TK, Hegde AN. 2005. Differential regulation of proteasome activity in the nucleus and the synaptic terminals. Neurochem Int (Epub ahead of print).
31. Remenyi A, Scholer HR, Wilmanns M. 2004. Combinatorial control of gene expression. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:812-815.