Development and characterization of multi-sensory fluence rate probes

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1929-1940

  Pomerleau Dalcourt, Natalie ^a   Lilge, Lothar ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETECTORS; FLUORESCENCE; LIGHT SCATTERING; PHOTODEGRADATION; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY;

MULTI-SENSORY FLUENCE RATE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES (PLS)-BASED ANALYSIS; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT) TREATMENT;

SENSORS;

GLASS FIBER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; FLUORESCENCE; FLUOROSCOPY; LIGHT; MEASUREMENT; PHOTODEGRADATION; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FAT EMULSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FIBER OPTICS; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENT DYES; PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY; SCATTERING, RADIATION;

EID: 33645320017     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/021     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bissonnette R and Lui H 1997 Current status of photodynamic therapy in dermatology Clin. Dermatol. 15 507-19
2. Dickey D J, Partridge K, Moore R B and Tulip J 2004 Light dosimetry for multiple cylindrical diffusing sources for use in photodynamic therapy Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3197-208
3. Dougherty T J, Gomer C J, Henderson B W and Jori G 1998 Photodynamic therapy J. Natl Cancer Inst. 90 889-905
4. Driver I, Feather J W, King P R and Dawson J B 1989 The optical properties of aqueous suspensions of Intralipid, a fat emulsion Phys. Med. Biol. 34 1927-30
5. Foster T H and Nichols M G 1995 Oxygen sensitivity of PDT determined from time-dependent electrode measurements in spheroids Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2392 141-51
6. Gossner L 2002 Photodynamic therapy: esophagus Can. J. Gastroenterol. 16 642-4
7. Iinuma S, Schomacker K T, Wagnieres G, Rajadhyaksha M, Bamberg M, Momma T and Hasan T 1999 In vivo fluence rate and fractionation effects on tumour response and photobleaching: photodynamic therapy with two photosensitizers in an orthoptic rat tumour model Cancer Res. 59 6164-70
8. Jankun J, Lilge L, Douplik A, Keck R W, Pestka M, Sykudlarek M, Stevens P J, Lee R J and Selman S H 2004 Optical characteristics of the canine prostate at 665 nm sensitized with tin etiopurpurin dichloride: need for real-time monitoring of photodynamic therapy J. Urol. 172 739-43
9. Lilge L, Haw T and Wilson B C 1993 Miniature isotropic optical fibre probes for quantitative light dosimetry in tissue Phys. Med. Biol. 38 215-30
10. Lilge L, Molpus K, Hasan T and Wilson B C 1998 Light dosimetry for intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy in a murine xenograft model of human epithelial ovarian carcinoma Photochem. Photobiol. 68 281-8
11. Lilge L and Wilson B C 1998 Photodynamic therapy of intracranial tissues: a preclinical comparative study of four different photosensitizers J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 16 81-91
12. Manyak M J 1995 Practical aspects of photodynamic therapy for superficial bladder carcinoma Tech. Urol. 1 84-93
13. Ost D 2003 Photodynamic therapy in lung cancer: a review Methods Mol. Med. 75 507-26
14. Pomerleau-Dalcourt N, Weersink R and Lilge L 2005 PLS-based decomposition of five spectrally overlapping factors Appl. Spectrosc. 59 1406-14
15. Prosst R L, Wolfsen H C and Gahlen J 2003 Photodynamic therapy for esophageal diseases: a clinical update Endoscopy 35 1059-68
16. Star W M 1997 Light dosimetry in vivo Phys. Med. Biol. 42 763-87
17. Star W M and Marijnissen J P A 1989 Calculating the response of isotropic light dosimetry probes as a function of the tissue refractive index Appl. Opt. 28 2288-99
18. Star W M, Marijnissen J P A and van Gemert M J C 1987 New trends in photobiology light dosimetry: status and prospect J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1 149-87
19. Stone N 2003 Standardizing dosimetry in esophageal PDT: an argument for use of centering devices and removal of misleading units Tech. Cancer Res. Treat. 2 333-8
20. van Staveren H J, Moes C J M, van Marle J, Prahl S A and van Gemert M J C 1991 Light scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm Appl. Opt. 30 4507-14
21. Vulcan T G et al 2000 Comparison between isotropic and nonisotropic dosimetry systems during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy Lasers Surg. Med. 26 292-301
22. Wilson B C 2002 Photodynamic therapy for cancer: principles Can. J. Gastroenterol. 16 393-6
23. Wilson B C, Patterson M S and Lilge L 1997 Implicit and explicit dosimetry in photodynamic therapy: a new paradigm Lasers Med. Sci. 12 182-99 (Review article)
24. Wolfsen H C 2005 Present status of photodynamic therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 39 189-202
25. Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L and Henshaw K 2003 Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4 CD002030
26. Zhu T C, Finlay J C and Hahn S M 2005 Determination of the distribution of light, optical properties, drug concentration, and tissue oxygenation in-vivo in human prostate during motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 79 231-41