Highly designable phenotypes and mutational buffers emerge from a systematic mapping between network topology and dynamic output

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 103, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 4180-4185

  Nochomovitz, Yigal D ^a   Li, Hao ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Designability; Dynamical phenotype; Enumeration; Mutational buffering; Regulatory network

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; DYNAMICS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; MODEL; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM;

BIOPHYSICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 33645307369     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507032103     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McAdams, H. H. & Shapiro, L. (1995) Science 269, 650-656.
2. Jaspersen, S. L., Charles, J. F., Tinker-Kulberg, R. L. & Morgan, D. O. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2803-2817.
3. Li, F., Long, T., Lu, Y., Ouyang, Q. & Tang, C. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4781-4786.
4. Ueda, H. R., Hayashi, S., Chen, W., Sano, M., Machida, M., Shigeyoshi, Y., Iino, M. & Hashimoto, S. (2005) Nat. Genet. 37, 187-192.
5. Alon, U., Surette, M. G., Barkai, N. & Leibler, S. (1999) Nature 397, 168-171.
6. Zhu, X. M., Yin, L., Hood, L. & Ao, P. (2004) J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2, 785-817.
7. Bagowski, C. P., Besser, J., Frey, C. R. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr. (2003) Curr. Biol. 13, 315-320.
8. Morgan, D. O. (1997) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 261-291.
9. Kobiler, O., Rokney, A., Friedman, N., Court, D. L., Stavans, J. & Oppenheim, A. B. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4470-4475.
10. Ferrell, J. E., Jr. (2002) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 140-148.
11. Berg, H. C. (1988) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 53, 1-9.
12. Barkai, N. & Leibler, S. (1997) Nature 387, 913-917.
13. Kato, A., Latifi, T. & Groisman, E. A. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4706-4711.
14. Yokobayashi, Y., Weiss, R. & Arnold, F. H. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16587-16591.
15. Elowitz, M. B. & Leibler, S. (2000) Nature 403, 335-338.
16. Guet, C. C., Elowitz, M. B., Hsing, W. & Leibler, S. (2002) Science 296, 1466-1470.
17. Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. S. (1996) Science 273, 666-669.
18. Li, H., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4987-4990.
19. Wingreen, N. S., Li, H. & Tang, C. (2004) Polymer 45, 699-705.
20. Thieffry, D. & Sánchez, L. (2004) in Modularity in Development and Evolution, eds. Schlosser, G. & Wagner, G. P. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 222-243.
21. Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D. & Alon, U. (2002) Science 298, 824-827.
22. Klemm, K. & Bornholdt, S. (2005) Phys. Rev. E 72, 055101(R).
23. Klemm, K. & Bornholdt, S. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18414-18419.
24. Remy, E., Mosse, B., Chaouiya, C. & Thieffry, D. (2003) Bioinformatics 19, Suppl. 2, ii172-ii178.
25. Bergman, A. & Siegel, M. L. (2003) Nature 424, 549-552.
26. Siegel, M. L. & Bergman, A. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10528-10532.
27. Queitsch, C., Sangster, T. A. & Lindquist, S. (2002) Nature 417, 618-624.
28. Hartman, J. L., IV, Garvik, B. & Hartwell, L. (2001) Science 291, 1001-1004.
29. Glass, L. & Kauffman, S. A. (1973) J. Theor. Biol. 39, 103-129.
30. Tarjan, R. E. (1972) SIAM J. Comput. 1, 146-160.