The phenomenal content of experience

Mind and Language

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 187-219

  Raftopoulos, Athanassios ^a   Müller, Vincent C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645294637     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2006.00311.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Baddeley, A. 1995: Working memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K. and Rajesh R. P. 1997: Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
3. Bermúdez, J. L. 1995: Nonconceptual content: from perceptual experience to sub-personal computational states. Mind & Language, 10 (4), 333-369.
4. Bickhard, M. H. 1996: Troubles with computationalism. In W. O'Donohue and R.F. Kitchener (eds), The Philosophy of Psychology. London: Sage.
5. Block, N. 1996: How can we find the neural correlate of consciousness? Trends in Neuroscience, 19, 456-459.
6. Campbell, J. 1999: The Role of physical objects in spatial thinking, In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, and B. Brewer (eds), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 65-97.
7. Carey, S. and Xu, F. 2001: Infant's knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179-213.
8. Churchland, P. M. 1988: Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science, 55, 167-187.
9. Clark, A. 1999 An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345-351.
10. Crane, T. 1992: The nonconceptual content of experience. In T. Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cussins, A. 1990: The connectionist construction of concepts. In M. Boden (ed.), The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Czigler, I. and Balazs, L. 1998: Object-related attention: An event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition, 38, 113-124.
13. Devitt, M. 1996: Coming to our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dretske, F. 1993: Conscious Experience. Mind, 102 (406), 263-283,
15. Dretske, F. 1995: Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT University Press.
16. Driver, J., David G., Russell C., Turatto M. and Freeman, E. (2001); Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
17. Edelman, S. 1999: Representation and Recognition in Vision. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. Evans, G. 1982: The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Glover S. 2003: Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press).
21. Goodale, M. A. and Milner, D. A. 1992: Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
22. Gregory, R. L. 1990: Eye and Brain: the Psychology of Seeing (4th edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Hanson, N. R. 1958: Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Heck, Jr. R. 2000: Nonconceptual content and the 'space of reasons'. Philosophical Review, 109 (4), 483-523.
25. Hildreth, E. C. and Ulmann, S. 1989: The computational study of vision. In Michael I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Jackendoff, R. 1989: Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT University Press.
27. Kahneman, D, Treisman, A. and Gibbs, B. J. 1992: The reviewing of the object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 174-219.
28. Kanwisher, N. 2001: Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition, 79, 89-113.
29. Kuhn, T. 1968: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
30. Laberge, D. 2000: Networks of attention. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, second edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31. Lamme, V. 2004: Independent neural definitions of visual awareness and attention. In A. Raftopoulos (ed.), The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Hauppauge, NJ: Nova Science Books.
32. Lamme, V. 2003: Why visual attention and awareness are different? Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 12-18.
33. Lamme, A. F. and Spekreijse, H. 2000: Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex and scene perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, second edition Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Lamme, V. A. F. and Roelfsema, P. R. 2000: The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 571-579.
35. Lowe, E. J. 1992: Experience and its objects. In T. Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Luck, S. J. and Hillyard, S. A. 2000: The operation of selective attention at multiple stages of processing: Evidence from human and monkey electrophysiology. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, second edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37. Mack, A. & Rock, I. 1998: Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Mangun, G. R., Amishi J. P., Hopfinger J. B. and Handy, C. T. 2000: The temporal dynamics and functional architecture of attentional processes in human extrastriate cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39. Marr, D. 1982: Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
40. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. 2001: Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115-134.
41. Moore, C. M. and Egeth, H. 1998: Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
42. Needham, A. Baillargeon, R. 2000: Infants' use of featural and experiential information in segregating and individuating objects. Cognition, 74, 255-284.
43. Norman, J. 2002: Two visual systems and two theories of perception: an attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73-144.
44. Peacocke, C. 1992: A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45. Peacocke, C. 2001: Does perception have a nonconceptual content? The Journal of Philosophy, XCVIII (5), 239-269.
46. Petitot, J. 1995: Morphodynamics and attractor syntax: constituency in visual perception and cognitive grammar. In R. F. Port and T. Van Gelder (eds), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Posner, M. I. and Petersen, S. E. 1990: The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
48. Posner, M. I. and Raichle, M. E. 1994: Images of Mind. New York: The American Scientific Library.
49. Pylyshyn, Z. 1999: Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-423.
50. Pylyshyn, Z. 2001: Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127-158.
51. Pylyshyn, Z. and Storm, R. W. 1988: Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 178-197.
52. Scholl, B. J. 2001: Objects and attention: the state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
53. Scholl, B. J. and Leslie, A. M. 1999: Explaining the infant's object concept: beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore and Z. Pylyshyn (eds.), What is Cognitive Science? Malden, MA: Blackwell.
54. Smith, A. D. 2002: The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Shoemaker, S. 2002: Introspection and phenomenal character. In D. J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Spelke, E. S. 1990: Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29-56.
57. Stalnaker, R. 2003: What might nonconceptual content be? In York H. Gunther, (ed.), Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
58. Treisman, A. 1993: The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (ed), Attention: Selection, Awareness, Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Tye, M. 2002: Visual qualia and visual content revisited. In D. J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Tye, M. 2005: Nonconceptual content, richness and fineness of grain. Forthcoming in T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds), Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Ulmann, S. 1979: The Interpretation of Visual Motion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
62. Vecera, P. 2000: Toward a biased competition account of object-based segmentation and attention. Brain and Mind, 1, 353-384.
63. Xu, F. and Carey, S. 1996: Infant's metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 11-153.
64. Ziegler, J. C., Besson, M., Jacobs, A. M., and Tatjiana, A. N. 1997: Word, pseudo-word, and nonword processing: a multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (6), 758-775.