Student perspectives on pharmacy curriculum and instruction in Egyptian schools

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  El Awady, El Sayed E ^a   Moss, Stephen ^b   Mottram, David ^c   O'Donnell, James ^d  

^a SUEZ CANAL UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^c LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning; Curriculum development; Education; Egypt; Pharmacy; Problem based learning; Student perspectives

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EGYPT; METHODOLOGY; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY STUDENT; SCHOOL; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EGYPT; FACULTY; PHARMACISTS; SCHOOLS, PHARMACY; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 33645289396     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj700109     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barzak MY, Ball PA, Ledger R. Rationale and efficacy of problem-based learning and computer-assisted learning in pharmaceutical education. Pharm Educ. 2001;1:105-13.
2. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy: Commission to Implement Change. "Papers from the Commission to Implement Change in Pharmaceutical Education. Background Paper I: what is the mission of pharmaceutical education? Am J Pharm Educ. 1993;57:374-6.
3. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy: Educational Outcomes 2004. Available at: http://www.aacp.org. Accessed March 31st 2005.
4. ACCP, "A vision of pharmacy's future roles, responsibilities, and manpower needs in the United States." Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20:991-1020.
5. Quality Assurance Agency. Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/crntwork/ benchmark/phase2/pharmacy.htm. Accessed 13th December 2004.
6. Sie D, Bates I, Aggarwal R, Borja-Lopetegi A. An analysis of the new UK Master of Pharmacy degree programme: rhetoric or reality. Pharm Educ. 2003;3:169-75.
7. The Pharmacy Consortium for Computer Assisted learning (PCCAL) Available at: http://www.coacs.com/pccal. Accessed January 31st 2005.
8. Antal I, Matyus P, Marton S, Vincze Z. Developing the pharmacy curriculum in a Hungarian faculty. Pharm Educ. 2002;1:241-6.
9. Popa A, Crisan O, Sandulescu R, Bojita M. Pharmaceutical care and pharmacy education in Romania. Pharm Educ. 2002;2:11-4.
10. Sramkova P, De Jong-Van Den Berg LTW, Oerlemans APWM. Comparison of Dutch and Czech systems of pharmacy studies. Pharm Educ. 2004;4:153-63.
11. World List of Pharmacy Schools. Available at: http://www.fip.org/ education/C-F/EGYP.html. Accessed March 31st 2005.
12. Higher Education Enhancement Programme (HEEP) for Egypt. Available at: http://www.tempus-egypt.com.html. Accessed 2nd April 2005.
13. The Third International Internet Education Conference, Cairo, Egypt, October 2004. Available at: http://www.distant-learning.net/contact.shtml.
14. European Commission (Tempus). Available at: http://www.etf.eu.int/tempus. nsf. Accessed January 31, 2005.
15. Delva MD, Woodhouse RA, Hains S, Birtwhistle RE, Knapper C, Kirby JR. Does PBL matter? Relations between instructional context, learning strategies and learning outcomes. Adv Health Serv Educ. 2000;5:167-77.
16. Cheng JWM, Alafris A, Kirschenbaum HL, Kalis MM, Brown ME. Problem-based learning versus traditional lecturing in pharmacy students' short-term examination performance. Pharm Educ. 2003;3:117-25.
17. Cisneros RM, Salisbury-Glennon JD, Anderson-Harper HM. Status of problem-based learning research in pharmacy education: A call for future research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66:19-26.
18. Kidd RS, Johnson MS, Smith DL, Robinson ET, Newton DW. An incremental approach to incorporating case-based learning into pharmacy curricula. Pharm Educ. 2003;3:17-28.
19. Mailhot C, St-Jean M. Review process for an entry-level degree program in pharmacy: A successful approach. Pharm Educ. 2002;2:117-27.