Exchanges of medical information during the follow up of breast cancer patients: Perceptions and expectations of the community- and the hospital based practitioners;Échanges d'informations médicales dans la prise en charge des patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein: Perceptions et attentes des médecins traitants de ville et des spécialistes hospitaliers

Bulletin du Cancer

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-231

  Milliat Guittard, Laure ^a   Letrilliart, Laurent ^a   Galand Desmé, Sophie ^a,d   Berthoux, Nicole ^a   Charlois, Anne Laure ^a   Romestaing, Pascale ^b,d   Méré, Pascale ^c   Schott, Anne Marie ^a   Touzet, Sandrine ^a   Colin, Carille ^a,d  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

^c Service de Radiothérapie   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Communication; Interprofessional relations; Medical records; Physician

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; BREAST TUMOR; GENERAL PRACTICE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS;

EID: 33645216559     PISSN: 00074551     EISSN: 17696917     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lansac J, Diouf A. Suivi de femmes traitées pour cancer du sein. Rev Prat 1998; 48: 71-6.
2. Donnelly J, Mack P, Donaldson LA. Follow-up of breast cancer: time for a new approach? Int J Clin Praft 2001; 55: 431-3.
3. Klastersky J. Rôle du médecin généraliste dans le traitement du malade cancéreux. Rev Med Brux 1984; 5: 455-62.
4. Wood M. Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Physician 1993; 39: 49-57.
5. Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis JL, Raymond D, Lafrance A. L'informatisation du dossier médical et ses détracteurs. Sci Soc Santé 1998; 16: 81-120.
6. Deboscker Y. Le dossier médical dans les établissements de santé. Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1997.
7. Molinier L, Aziza R, Bailler D, Bombail M, Daubert E, Gladieff L, et al. Evaluation de la qualité du dossier du patient à l'Institut Claudius-Regaud. Bull Cancer 2001; 88: 793-803.
8. Guittard L, Colin C. Le dossier medical partagé: différences applications pout un réseau de soins. J Econ Med 2001; 19: 401-13.
9. Labtèze L. Techniques et methodes nouvelles des moyens de communication en oncologie. Bull Cancer 2001; 88: 114-20.
10. Drury M, Yudkin P, Harcourt J, Fitzpatrick R, Jones L, Alcock C, et al. Patients with cancer holding their own records: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 105-10.
11. William JG, Cheung WY, Chetwynd N, Cohen DR, El-Sharkawi S, Finlay I, et al. Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 159-65.
12. Cornbleet MA, Campbell P, Murray S, Stevenson M, Bond S. Patient-held record in cancer and palliative care: a randomized, prospective trial. Palliat Med 2002; 16: 205-12.
13. Drury M, Harcourt J, Minton M. The acceptability of patients with cancer holding their own shared-care record. Psychooncology 1996; 5: 119-25.
14. Direction générale de la santé. Cancer, le plan de mobilisation nationale. Mars 2003.
15. Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract 2002; 19: 105-11.
16. Van der Kam WJ, Branger PJ, Van Bemmel JH, Meyboom de Jong B. Communication between physicians and with patients suffering from breast cancer. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 415-9.
17. McPhee SJ, Lo B, Saika GY, Meltzer R. How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspeciality consultants? Arch Intern Med 1984; 144: 1265-8.
18. Piganeau K. Les médecins libéraux et le partage des données: du chemin à parcourir pour le DMP. Quot Méd 2004: 7629.
19. Matillon Y, Spira C, Sepetjan M, Pasquier J. Relations entre médecins de ville et médecins hospitaliers: pour une amélioration de la qualité des soins délivrés aux malades. Concours Med 1986; 108: 389-91.
20. Observatoire régional de la santé des Pays de la Loire. Médecins généralistes et centres hospitaliers de Vendée: enquête sur les relations avec les services de médecine. Nantes, 1999.
21. Letourmy A, Carricaburu D, Bungener M. La prise en charge des malades cancéreux par le médecin généraliste dans cinq pays européens. Rev Fr Aff Soc 1999; 2: 37-50.
22. Collectif d'auteurs. Médecins généralistes et cancers. Rev Prat 1983; 33: 2929-84.
23. Tattersall MH, Butow PN, Brown JE, Thompson JF. Improving doctors' letters. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 516-20.
24. Tattersall MH, Griffin A, Dunn SM, Monaghan H, Scatchard K, Butow PN. Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation. What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist? Aust N Z J Med 1995; 25: 479-82.
25. Bado W, Williams CJ. Usefulness of letters from hospitals to general practitioners. BMJ 1984; 288: 1813-4.
26. Graham PH. Improving communication with specialists. The case of an oncology clinic. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 625-7.
27. Wood ML, McWilliam CL. Cancer in remission. Challenge in collaboration for family physicians and oncologists. Can Fam Physician 1996; 42: 899-910.
28. Liaw ST. Patient and general practitioner perceptions of patient-held health records. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 406-15.
29. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Gilmour WH, Atkinson JM, Barrett A, et al. Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ 1999; 319: 1247-8.
30. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis C, et al. Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross selectional survey of patients' views. Br Med J 1996; 313: 724-6.
31. Phanuel D. Les attentes des «patients clients» en matière d'information et de communication: dimensions médicale, humaine et administrative. Les cahiers de Gestions Hospitalières n° 119. Gest Hosp 1995; 342: 76-82.
32. Hoerni B. Participation des patients à la décision en cancérologie. Bull Cancer 2002; 89: 904-7.
33. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carrière KC, O'Neil J, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 1997; 277: 1485-92.
34. Giglio RJ, Papazian B. Acceptance and use of patient-carried health records. Med Care 1986; 24: 1084-92.
35. Johnson S, Mayor P. A patient-held record for cancer patients from diagnosis onwards. Int J Palliat Nurs 2002; 8: 182-9.
36. Lecouturier J, Crack L, Mannix K, Hall RH, Bond S. Evaluation of a patient-held record for patient with cancer Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2002; 11: 114-21.
37. Finlay IG, Wyatt P. Randomised cross-over study of patient-held records in oncology and palliative care. Lancet 1999; 353: 558-9.
38. Worster A, Wood M, Mcwhinney IR, Bass MJ. Who provides follow-up care for patients with early breast cancer? Can Fam Physician 1995; 41: 1314-20.
39. Circulaire N° DHOS/SDO/2005/101 du 22 février 2005 relative à l'organisation des soins en cancérologie.