FLO11 is the primary factor in flor formation caused by cell surface hydrophobicity in wild-type flor yeast

Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 660-666

  Ishigami, Mari ^a   Nakagawa, Youji ^a   Hayakawa, Masayuki ^a   Iimura, Yuzuru ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

FLO11; Flor formation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Wild type flor yeast

Indexed keywords

CARBON; GLUCOSE; STRAIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WINE; YEAST;

FLO11; FLOR FORMATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WILD-TYPE FLOR YEAST;

HYDROPHOBICITY;

ALCOHOL; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MUC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NEU DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYDROPHOBICITY; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOFILMS; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED; ETHANOL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; NEUREGULIN-1; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33645211207     PISSN: 09168451     EISSN: 13476947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.70.660     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ibears, J. I., Lozano, I., Perdigones, F., and Jimenez, J., Dynamics of 'flor' yeast populations during the biological ageing of sherry wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 48, 75-79 (1997).
2. Zara, S., Farris, G. A., Budroni, M., and Bakalinsky, A. T., HSP12 is essential for biofilm formation by a Sardinian wine strain of S. cerevisiae. Yeast, 19, 269-276 (2002).
3. Cantarelli, C., and Martini, A., On the pellicle formation by 'flor' yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. Suppl. Yeast Sympos., 35, F35-F36 (1969).
4. Iimura, Y., Hara, S., and Otsuka, K., Cell surface hydrophobicity as pellicle formation factor in a film strain of Saccharomyces. Agric. Biol. Chem., 44, 1215-1222 (1980).
5. Iimura, Y., Hara, S., and Otsuka, K., Fatty acids as hydrophobic substance on cell surface of film strain of Saccharomyces. Agric. Biol. Chem., 44, 1223-1229 (1980).
6. Ishigami, M., Nakagawa, Y., Hayakawa, M., and Iimura, Y., FLO11 is essential for flor formation caused by the C-terminal deletion of NRG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 237, 425-430 (2004).
7. Zara, S., Bakalinsky, A. T., Zara, G., Pirino, G., Demontis, M. A., and Budroni, M., FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71, 2934-2939 (2005).
8. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T., Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (1989).
9. Rose, M., Winston, F., and Hieter, P., Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (1990).
10. Brachmann, C. B., Davies, A., Cost, G. J., Caputo, E., Li, J., Hieter, P., and Boeke, J. D., Designer deletion strain derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast, 14, 115-132 (1998).
11. Yamazaki, T., Kaneko, Y., Harashima, S., and Oshima, Y., Correlation between sulfur dioxide tolerance of a wine yeast strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its chromosome XVI mobility in pulsed-field gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Brew. Soc. Jpn., 91, 640-643 (1995).
12. Wach, A., PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast, 12, 259-265 (1996).
13. Goldstein, A. L., and McCusker, J. H., Three new dominant drug resistance for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 15, 1541-1553 (1999).
14. Misu, K., Fujimura-Kamada, K., Ueda, T., Nakano, A., Katoh, H., and Tanaka, K., Cdc50p, a conserved endosomal membrane protein, controls polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 730-747 (2003).
15. Gietz, R. D., and Woods, R. A., High efficiency transformation with lithium acetate. In "Molecular Genetics of Yeast, A Practical Approach," ed. Johnson, J. R., IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 121-134 (1994).
16. Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K., and Kimura, A., Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol., 153, 163-168 (1983).
17. Hereford, L., Fahrner, K., Woodford, J., Jr., Rosbash, M., and Kaback, D. B., Isolation of yeast histone genes H2A and H2B. Cell, 18, 1261-1271 (1979).
18. Elder, R. T., Loh, E. Y., and Davis, R. W., RNA from the yeast transposable element Ty1 has both ends in the direct repeats, a structure similar to retrovirus RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 2432-2436 (1983).
19. Park, S. H., Kho, S. S., Chun, J. H., Hwang, H. J., and Kang, H. S., Nrg1 is a transcriptional repressor for glucose repression of STA1 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 2044-2050 (1999).
20. Vyas, V. K., Kuchin, S., and Carlson, M., Interaction of the repressors Nrg1 and Nrg2 with the Snf1 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 158, 563-572 (2001).
21. Zhou, H., and Winston, F., NRG1 is required for glucose repression of the SUC2 and GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genet., 2, 5 (2001).
22. Lo, W. S., and Dranginis, A. M., FLO11, a yeast gene related to the STA genes, encodes a novel cell surface flocculin. J. Bacteriol., 178, 7144-7151 (1996).