Understanding the roles of online meetings in a net-based course

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 13-23

  Berge, O ^a   Fjuk, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Apprenticeship; Case study; Groupware; Networked learning; Standardization

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645122448     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00156.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chang W.-C., Hsu H.-H., Smith T.K. & Wang C.-C. (2004) Enhancing SCORM metadata for assessment authoring in e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 305-316.
2. Cortez C., Nussbaum M., López X., Rodríguez P., Santelices R., Rosas R. & Marianov V. (2005) Teachers' support with ad-hoc collaborative networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, 171-180.
3. Engeström Y. (1987) Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit.
4. Engeström Y., Miettinen R. & Punamäki R.-L. eds (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Feenberg A. (1989) The written world: on the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In Mindweave. Communication, Computers, and Distance Education (eds R. Mason & A. Kaye), pp. 22-39. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
6. Fjuk A. (1998) Computer support for distributed collaborative learning. Exploring a complex problem area. Unpublished Dr. Scient Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
7. Fjuk A. & Dirckinck-Holmfeld L. (1997) Articulation of actions in distributed collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 9, 3-24.
8. Fjuk A. & Ludvigsen S. (2001) The complexity of distributed collaborative learning: unit of analysis. In Proceedings of Euro CSCL'01. First European Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht (eds P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen) pp. 237-244. Maastricht McLuhan Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
9. Harasim L.M. (1990) Online education: an environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In Online Education. Perspectives on a New Environment (ed. L.M. Harasim), pp. 39-65. Praeger, New York.
10. Kaptelinin V. (2005) The object of activity: making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12, 4-18.
11. Kaye A.R. ed. (1992) Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing. The Najaden Papers. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
12. Knudsen J.L. & Madsen O.L. (1990) Teaching Object-Oriented Programming is More Than Teaching ObjectOriented Programming Languages (No. DAIMI-PB 251). Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
13. Kuutti K. (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and Consciousness. Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (ed.Nardi B.A.) pp. 17-44. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Leinonen T., Virtanen O., Hakkarainen K. & Kligyte G. (2002) Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference, Boulder, CO (ed. Stahl G), pp. 529-530. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
15. Leontiev A.N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Madsen O.L., Møller-Pedersen B. & Nygaard K. (1993) Object-Oriented Programming in the Beta Programming Language. Addison-Wesley, New York.
17. McGreal R. ed. (2004) Online Education Using Learning Objects. Routledge, London.
18. Nielsen K. & Kvale S. (1997) Current issues of apprenticeship. Nordisk Pedagogik 17, 130-139.
19. Paulsen M.F. (1993) The hexagon of cooperative freedom: a distance education theory attuned to computer conferencing. The Distance Education Online Symposium, 3. http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews/deosnews3_2. asp [Accessed 9 October 2005]
20. Scardamalia M. & Bereiter C. (1994) Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3, 265-283.
21. Slotta J. (2002) Partnerships in the web-based inquiry science environment (WISE). Cognitive Studies 9, 351-361.
22. Stahl G. (2004) Groupware goes to school: adapting BSCW to the classroom. Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 19, 162-174.
23. Vygotsky L.S. (1978) Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
24. Vygotsky L.S. (1986) Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Wasson B. & Ludvigsen S. (2003) Designing for knowledge building. ITU Report No. 19, ITU, Oslo.
26. Wells G. (1993) Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 5, 1-38.
27. Wenger E. (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7, 225-246.
28. Wertsch J.V. (1991) Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
29. Wiley D. (2000) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (ed. D. Wiley). pp. 1-35. The Agency for Instructional Technology and AECT, Bloomington, IN.