Etomidate speech and memory test (eSAM): A new drug and improved intracarotid procedure

Neurology

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1723-1729

  Jones Gotman, M ^a   Sziklas, V ^a   Djordjevic, J ^a   Dubeau, F ^a   Gotman, J ^a   Angle, M ^a   Tampieri, D ^a   Olivier, A ^a   Andermann, F ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOBARBITAL; ETOMIDATE; NEW DRUG; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; APHASIA; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BOLUS INJECTION; CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COOPERATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DRUG INFUSION; DRUG SUBSTITUTION; DYSTONIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; EPILEPTIC DISCHARGE; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; INTRACAROTID AMOBARBITAL PROCEDURE; MALE; MEMORY; MYOCLONUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEIZURE; SHIVERING; SLOW BRAIN WAVE; SPEECH; TREMOR; BRAIN CORTEX; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG EFFECT; HISTOLOGY; LANGUAGE TEST; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMOBARBITAL; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; APHASIA; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; ETOMIDATE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SPEECH;

EID: 33645076067     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187975.78433.cb     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Wada J. Youthful season revisited. Brain Cogn 1997;33:7-10.
2. Wada J. Clinical experimental observations of carotid artery injections of sodium Amytal. Brain Cogn 1997;33:11-13.
3. Wada J, Rasmussen T. Intracarotid injection of sodium Amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance: experimental and clinical observations. J Neurosurg 1960;17:226-282.
4. Branch C, Milner B, Rasmussen T. Intracarotid sodium Amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance: observations in 123 patients. J Neurosurg 1964;21:399-405.
5. Jones-Gotman M, Smith ML, Wieser H-G. Intraarterial amobarbital procedures. In: Engel J Jr., Pedley T, eds. Epilepsy: a comprehensive textbook (volume 2). New York: Raven Press, 1998;1767-1775.
6. Bouwer M, Jones-Gotman M, Gotman J. Duration of sodium Amytal effect: behavioral and EEG measures. Epilepsia 1993;34:61-68.
7. Ravdin L, Perrine K, Haywood C, Gershengorn J, Nelson P, Devinsky O. Serial recovery of language during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 1997;33:151-160.
8. Fedio P, August A, Patronas N, Sato S, Kufta C. Semantic, phonological and perceptual changes following left and right intracarotid injection (Wada) with a low Amytal dosage. Brain Cogn 1997;33:98-117.
9. Loring D, Meador K, Lee G. Amobarbital dose effects on Wada memory testing. J Epilepsy 1992;5:171-174.
10. Isnard J, Garde P, Fischer C, Duquesnel J, Mauguiere F. Manifestations cliniques et electroencephalographiques lors du test de Wada par injection intracarotidienne de methohexital (Brietal). Rev Neurol 1994;150:266-273.
11. Bacia T, Bendarzewska-Nawrocka B, Szymanska O, et al. A comparison of Wada test for cerebral speech dominance by use of Amytal or brietal. Neurol Neurochir 1998;32:247-255.
12. Buchtel HA, Passaro EA, Selwa LM, Deveikis J, Gomez-Hassan D. Sodium methohexital (Brevital) as an anesthetic in the Wada test. Epilepsia 2002;43:1056-1061.
13. Bazin JE, Picard P, Gabrillargues J, Dordain M. Propofol administered via the carotid artery to achieve a Wada test [letter to the editor]. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:707-708.
14. Silva TM, Hernandez-Fustes OJ, Bueno ML, Hernandez-Fustes OJ, Varela AM, Machado S. The Wada test with propofol in a patient with epilepsy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2000;58:348-350.
15. Takayama M, Miyamoto S, Ikeda A, et al. Intracarotid propofol test for speech and memory dominance in man. Neurology 2004;63:510-515.
16. Wolf A, Weir P, Segar P, Stone J, Shield J. Impaired fatty acid oxidation in propofol infusion syndrome. Lancet 2001;357:606-607.
17. Mirenda J, Broyles G. Propofol as used for sedation in the ICU. Chest 1995;108:539-548.
18. Giese JL, Stanley TH. Etomidate: a new intravenous anesthetic induction agent. Pharmacotherapy 1983;3:251-258.
19. Wauquier A. Profile of etomidate. A hypnotic, anticonvulsant and brain protective compound. Anaesthesia 1983;38 Suppl:26-33.
20. Falk J, Zed PG. Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:1272-1277.
21. Oglesby AJ. Should etomidate be the induction agent of choice for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2004;21:655-659.
22. Rothermel LK. Newer pharmacologic agents for procedural sedation of children in the emergency department: etomidate and propofol. Curr Opin Pediatr 2003;15:200-203.
23. Reddy RV, Moorthy SS, Dierdorf SF, Deitch Jr. RD, Link L. Excitatory effects and electroencephalographic correlation of etomidate, thiopental, methohexital, and propofol. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1008-1011.
24. Ebrahim ZY, DeBoer GE, Luders H, Hahn JF, Lesser RP. Effect of etomidate on the electroencephalogram of patients with epilepsy. Anesth Analg 1986;65:1004-1006.
25. Krieger W, Copperman J, Laxer KD. Seizures with etomidate anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1985;64:1226-1227.
26. Hansen HC, Drenck NE. Generalised seizures after etomidate anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1988;43:805-806.
27. Grant IS, Hutchison G. Epileptiform seizures during prolonged etomidate sedation. Lancet 1983;27:511-512.
28. Wagner RL, White PF, Kan PB, Rosenthal MH, Feldman D. Inhibition of adrenal steroidogenesis by the anesthetic etomidate. N Engl J Med 1984;31:310:1415-1421.
29. Jones-Gotman M, Sziklas V. Intracarotid amobarbital procedure: a redesign. Epilepsia 1999;40(suppl 2):78. Abstract.
30. Gotman J, Bouwer MS, Jones-Gotman M. Intracranial EEG study of brain structures affected by internal carotid injection of sodium amobarbital. Neurology 1992;42:2136-2143.
31. Jones-Gotman M, Bouwer MS, Gotman J. EEG slow waves and memory performance during the intracarotid amobarbital test. Epilepsia 1994;35:61-69.
32. McMackin D, Jones-Gotman M, Dubeau F, et al. Asymmetry in regional cerebral blood flow in relation to language dominance: a study using co-registered SPECT and MRI during the intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure. Neurology 1998;50:943-950.
33. Dodrill CB, Ojemann GA. An exploratory comparison of three methods of memory assessment with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 1997;33:210-223.
34. Eddleston JM, Shelly MP. The effect of lipid concentrations of a prolonged infusion of propofol-hypertriglyceridemia associated with propofol administration. Intens Care Med 1991;17:424-426.
35. De Leon-Casasola OA, Weiss A, Lema MJ. Anaphylaxis due to propofol. Anesthesiology 1992;77:384-386.
36. Laxenaire MC, Mata-Bermejo E, Moneret-Vautrin DA, et al. Life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions to propofol (Diprivan). Anesthesiology 1992;77:275-280.
37. McCulloch MJ, Lees NW. Assessment and modification of pain on induction with propofol (Diprivan). Anesthesia 1985;40:1117-1120.
38. Van Keulen SG, Burton JH. Myoclonus associated with etomidate for ED procedural sedation and analgesia. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21:556-558.
39. Greenberg M, Hilty C. Myoclonus after prolonged infusion of etomidate treated with dantrolene. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:489-490.
40. Guldner G, Schultz J, Sexton P, Fortner C, Richmond M. Etomidate for rapid-sequence intubation in young children: hemodynamic effects and adverse events. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:134-139.
41. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, et al. Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996;46:978-984.
42. Hunter KE, Blaxton TA, Bookheimer SY, et al. (15)O water positron emission tomography in language localization: a study comparing positron emission tomography visual and computerized region of interest analysis with the Wada test. Ann Neurol 1999;45:662-665.
43. Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B, et al. fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology 2004;63:1403-1408.
44. Detre JA, Maccotta L, King D, et al. Functional MRI lateralization of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1998;50:926-932.
45. Powell HW, Koepp MJ, Richardson MP, Symms MR, Thompson PJ, Duncan JS. The application of functional MRI of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: a clinical review. Epilepsia 2004;45:855-863.