A negotiation meta strategy combining trade-off and concession moves

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 163-181

  Ros, Raquel ^a   Sierra, Carles ^a  

^a ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE IIIA CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Negotiation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645030387     PISSN: 13872532     EISSN: 15737454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10458-006-5837-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (1998). Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24, 159-182.
2. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (2000). Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs. Proceedings of the 4th. International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 119-126). Boston, USA.
3. Faratin, P. Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (2002). Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142, 205-237.
4. Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2001). Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In Proceedings 8th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL) (pp. 53-68). Seattle, USA.
5. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A. R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., & Wooldrige, M. (2001). Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 199-215.
6. Li, C., Giampapa, J., & Sycara, K. (2003). A review of research literature on bilateral negotiations. In Tech. report CMU-RI-TR-03-41, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, November.
7. Li, C., Giampapa, J., & Sycara, K. (2004). Bilateral negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options. In The First IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Contracting, IEEE Computer Society (pp. 54-61). Los Alamitos, California (USA).
8. Lopes, F., Mamede, N., Novais, A.Q., & Coelho, H. (2002). A negotiation model for autonomous computational agents: Formal description and empirical evaluation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 12, 195-212.
9. Matos, N., & Sierra, C. (1999). Evolutionary computing and negotiation agents. Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, 1571, 126-150.
10. Mudgal, C., & Vassileva, J. (2000). Bilateral negotiation with incomplete and uncertain information: a decision-theoretic approach using a model of the opponent. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents IV, The Future of Information Agents in Cyberspace (pp. 107-118).
11. Noriega, P., & Sierra, C. (1998). Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce. In Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (pp. 70-90). Minneapolis, Minnesota, May.
12. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (1998). Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3) 261-192.
13. Sandholm, T., & Vulkan, N. (1999). Bargaining with Deadlines. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 44-51). Orlando, FL.
14. Teuteberg, F. (2003). Experimental evaluation of a model for multilateral negotiation with fuzzy preferences on an agent-based marketplace. Electronic Markets, 13(1). 21-32.
15. Zeng, D. & Sycara, K. (1998). Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 125-141.