Photoinduced anisotropic deformation in As2S3 glass

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers

Volumn 45, Issue 3 A, 2006, Pages 1668-1674

  Tanaka, Keiji ^a   Asao, Hideaki ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Amorphous semiconductor; As2S3; Chalcogenide glass; Photoinduced phenomenon

Indexed keywords

BIREFRINGENCE; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; LIGHT POLARIZATION; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY;

AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTOR; AS2S3; CHALCOGENIDE GLASS; PHOTOINDUCED PHENOMENON;

ARSENIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 33644978874     PISSN: 00214922     EISSN: 13474065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.45.1668     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. F. Weigert: Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 63 (1920) 681.
2. S. V. Pappu: Contemp. Phys. 26 (1985) 479.
3. H. Fritzsche; in Insulating and Semiconducting Glasses, ed. P. Boolchand (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000) Chap. 10.
4. N. F. Borrelli, C. M. Smith, J. J. Price and D. C. Allan: Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 219.
5. A. Natansohn and P. Rochon: Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 4139.
6. Y. Yu, M. Nakano and T. Ikeda: Nature 425 (2003) 145.
7. H. Jain: J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 5 (2003) 5.
8. K. Tanaka: in Handbook of Advanced Electronic and Phoronic Materials and Devices, ed. H. S. Nalwa (Academic Press, New York, 2001) Vol. 5, Chap. 4.
9. V. M. Lyubin and M. L. Klebanov: in Photo-Induced Metastability in Amorphous Semiconductors, ed. A. V. Kolobov (Wiley-VCH, Winheim, 2003) Chap. 6.
10. P. Krecmer, A. M. Moulin, R. J. Stephenson, T. Rayment, M. E. Welland and S. R. Elliott: Science 277 (1997) 1799.
11. M. Stuchlik, P. Krecmer and S. R. Elliott: in Photo-Induced Metastability in Amorphous Semiconductors, ed. A. V. Kolobov (Wiley-VCH, Winheira, 2003) Chap. 7.
12. K. Tanaka, T. Gotoh and H. Hayakawa: Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 2256.
13. T. Gotoh and K. Tanaka: J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 4703.
14. A. Saliminia, T. V. Galstian and A. Villeneuve: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4112.
15. H. Hamanaka, K. Tanaka, A. Matsuda and S. Iijima: Solid State Commun. 19 (1976) 499.
16. Y. Ikeda and K. Shimakawa: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 338 (2004) 539.
17. H. Hisakuni and K. Tanaka: Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) 2925.
18. V. G. Zhdanov and V. K. Malinovskii: Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 3 (1977) 387.
19. K. E. Asatryan, B. Paquet, T. Galstian and R. Vallée: Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 14208.
20. K. E. Asatryan, S. Frederick, T. Galstian and R. Vallée: Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2004) 1626.
21. K. E. Asatryan, T. Galstian and R. Vallée: Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 87401.
22. K. Tanaka and S. Nakayama: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1999) 3986.
23. K. Tanaka, K. Ishida and N. Yoshida: Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 9190.
24. The absorbed photon number is calculated from the incident light intensity and the absorption coefficient, neglecting light reflections and photodarkenig effects. Accordingly, the accuracy is estimated to be better than one order.
25. K. Tanaka: Philos. Mag. Lett. 79 (1999) 25.
26. K. Tanaka: Philos. Mag. Lett. 84 (2004) 601.
27. To examine the high-energy behavior, we have performed several experiments. Needlessly, thinner films (for instance 0.3 μm) gave smaller deformations with lower accuracy. It should also be mentioned that 2.5 eV light, which has a penetration depth of 1.4 μm, has not provided an appreciable efficiency difference in films with thicknesses of 2.3 and 0.3 μm. It seems that, in addition to the penetration depth, other effects such as light intensity give some additional effects on the efficiency.
28. K. Tanaka: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 266-269 (2000) 889.
29. H. Hisakuni and K. Tanaka: Science 270 (1995) 974.
30. K. Tanaka: C. R. Chim. 5 (2002) 805.
31. R. J. Kobliska and S. A. Solin: Phys. Rev. B 8 (1973) 756.
32. S. R. Elliott: Nature 354 (1991) 445.
33. V. K. Tikhomirov, L. F. Santos, R. M. Almeida, A. Jha, J. Kobelke and M. Scheffler: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 284 (2001) 198.
34. K. Matsushita, R. Arima, K. Kagota and S. Onari: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 266-269 (2000) 938.
35. N. V. Surovtsev, A. M. Pugachev, B. G. Nenashev and V. K. Malinovsky: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) 7651.
36. S. Bian, J. M. Williams, D. Y. Kim, L. Li, S. Balasubramanian. J. Kumar and S. Tripathy: J. Appl. Phys. 86 (1999) 4498.
37. J. P. Gordon: Phys. Rev. A 8 (1973) 14.
38. H. Fritzsche: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164-166 (1993) 1169.
39. K. Shimakawa: J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7 (2005) 145.
40. V. Lyubin, M. Klebanov and V. K. Tikhomirov: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 216806.
41. P. S. Ho and T. Kwok: Rep. Prog. Phys. 52 (1989) 301.
42. K. Tanaka: Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (1997) 261.
43. A. V. Kolobov, H. Oyanagi and K. Tanaka: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 145502.
44. V. K. Tikhomirov, K. Asatryan, T. V. Galstian, R. Vallée and A. B. Seddon: Philos. Mag. Lett. 83 (2003) 117.
45. G. Chen, H. Jain, M. Vlcek, S. Khalid, J. Li, D. A. Drabold and S. R. Elliott: Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 (2003) 706.
46. K. Tanaka: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1998) 1747.
47. K. Ishida and K. Tanaka: Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 206.
48. K. Tanaka: Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 5163.
49. T. Arai, H. Kataura, H. Yasuoka and S. Onari: J. Non-Cryst. Solids 77-78 (1985) 1145.
50. A quantitative analysis may be valuable here. Figure 7(b) shows that the Boson-peak intensity in the hillock is 70-80% of that in the unilluminated case. Provided that the intensity reduction corresponds to pure hydrostatic compression, taking the pressure result into account, we can envisage a generated pressure of ∼5 kbar. The bulk modulus of 125 kbar [K. Tanaka: Solid State Commun. 60 (1986) 295] implies that such a pressure can produce a densification of ∼4%, which is seemingly opposite to the result in Fig. 4(a). The difference may be due to a structural disordering effect.
51. N. Itoh and A. M. Stoneham: Materials Modification by Electronic Excitation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001).
52. E. Tarnow, A. Antoneli and J. D. Joannopoulos: Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 4059.
53. H. Koseki and A. Odajima: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21 (1982) 424.
54. J. Li and D. A. Drabold: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 2785.
55. J. Horbach and W. Kob: Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 3169.