Curriculum authoring tools and inclusive classroom teaching practice: A longitudinal study

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 177-189

  Bain, Alan ^a   Parkes, Robert John ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

CLASSROOM TEACHING; CURRICULUM AUTHORING TOOLS; CURRICULUM AUTHORING TOOLS (CAT); SECONDARY SCHOOL SETTING;

TEACHING;

EID: 33644978636     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00527.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Angrist, J. & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 12, 1-31.
2. Ashman, A. & Elkins, J. (Eds) (2004). Educating children with diverse abilities, 2nd ed. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Prentice Hall.
3. Bain, A. (1994, Summer). The school design model™ future school institute at Brewster Academy handbook. Wolfeboro, NH: The Endeavour Group.
4. Bain, A. (1996). The school design model at Brewster Academy: technology serving teaching and learning. Technological Horizons in Education, 23, 10, 72-79.
5. Bain, A., Fallon, M. & Smith, D. (1999). Designing the future. In T. Hillman & C. Thorn (Eds), Oh what a web we weave (pp. 262-272). Gilman, NH: Avocus Press.
6. Bain, A. & Huss, P. (2001). The curriculum authoring tools: technology enabling school reform. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28, 4, 14-17.
7. Bain, A., Huss, P. & Kwong, H. (2000). Evaluation of a hypertext discussion tool for teaching English literature to secondary school students. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 2, 203-216.
8. Bain, A. & Ross, K. (2000). School re-engineering and SAT-1 performance: a case study. The International Journal of Educational Reform, 9, 2, 148-154.
9. Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J. & Nataraj Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole school reform: new American schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
10. Blease, D. (1983). Observer effects on teachers and pupils in classroom research. Educational Review, 35, 3, 213-217.
11. Brosnan, M. (1996, Spring). Make it new: Brewster Academy reinvents itself. Independent School, 12-16.
12. Brown, J. (2000). Putting vision into practice. Converge, 3, 2. Retrieved December 3, 2000, from http://www.convergemag.com
13. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72, 3, 433-479.
14. Dimmock, C. A. J. (2000). Design the learning-centered school: a cross cultural perspective. London, England: Palmer Press, Garland Inc.
15. Edyburn, D. L. (2002). 2002 in review: a synthesis of the special education technology literature. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 4. Retrieved November 11, 2004, from http://jset.unIv.edu/16.4/hofstetter/ first.html
16. Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-78.
17. Greenwood, C. R. & Delquardi, J. (1995). Peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure, 39, 4, 21-25.
18. Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T. & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 3, 328-350.
19. Hasselbring, T. S. (2001). A possible future of special education technology. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 4. Retrieved November 11, 2004, from http://jset.unIv.edu/16.4/hofstetter/first.html
20. Hofstetter, F. T. (2001). The future's future: implications of emerging technology for special education program planning. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 4. Retrieved November 11, 2004, from http://jset.unIv.edu/16.4/hofstetter/first.html
21. Huck, R., Meyers, R. & Wilson, J. (1989). ADAPT: A developmental activity program for teachers. Pittsburgh, PA: Allegheny Intermediate Unit.
22. Hunter, M. (1982). Mastery teaching. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.
23. Kerzner-Lipsky, D. K. & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: transforming America's classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes.
24. McCord, M. (1999, February). Exploring the frontier of technology education reform. New Hampshire Business Review/TechNet, 12, 33-36.
25. McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (2004). The inclusive classroom: strategies for effective instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
27. Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43, 7, 60-69.
28. Samph, T. (1976). Observer effects on teacher verbal behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 6, 736-741.
29. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: research, theory and practice. New York: Cassell.
30. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J. & Kleiner, A. (Eds) (2000). Schools that learn: a fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday Dell.
31. Silvernail, D. L. & Harris, W. J. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teachers, students and school perspectives. Retrieved 10 January 2004 from the University of Southern Maine Center for Education Policy, Applied Research and Evaluation website: http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/mlti. htm
32. Sizer, T. (1984). Horace's compromise: the dilemma of the American high school, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: theory research and practice. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Student team learning: a practical guide to cooperative learning, 3rd ed. West Haven, CT: NEA.
35. Vaughn, S. & Arguilles, M. E. (2000). Adaptations in general education classrooms. In R. A. Villa & J. S. Thousand (Eds), Restructuring for caring and effective education: piecing the puzzle together, 2nd ed. (pp. 166-185). Baltimore: Brookes.
36. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
37. Wheelock, A. (1992). The case for untracking. Educational Leadership, 50, 2, 6-10.
38. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment, authenticity, context and validity, Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 3, 200-208, 210-214.
39. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.