Cosmetics: They influence more than Caucasian female facial attractiveness

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 493-504

  Nash, Rebecca ^a   Fieldman, George ^a   Hussey, Trevor ^a   Lévêque, Jean Luc ^b   Pineau, Patricia ^b  

^a BUCKINGHAMSHIRE NEW UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644972635     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00016.x     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Aucoin, K. (1997). Making faces. London: Prion.
2. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 77(1), 65-84.
3. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
4. Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1989). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 349-355.
5. Chao, A., & Schor, J. B. (1998). Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 107-131.
6. Cox, C., & Click, W. (1986). Resume evaluation and cosmetics use: When more is not better. Sex Roles, 74, 51-58.
7. Fatt, J. P. T. (2000). Attractiveness and outcome of job interviews. Management Research News, 23(1), 11-18.
8. Franzoi, S. L. (2001). Is female body esteem shaped by benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 44, 177-188.
9. Holme, S. A., Beattie, P. E., & Fleming, C. J. (2002). Cosmetic camouflage advice improves quality of life. British Journal of Dermatology, 747, 946-949.
10. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a good genes explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 22, 417-429.
11. Kyle, D. J., & Mahler, H. I. (1996). The effects of hair colour and cosmetic use on perceptions of a female's ability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 447-455.
12. Miller, L., & Cox, C. (1982). For appearance's sake: Public self-consciousness and makeup use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 748-751.
13. Mulhern, R., Fieldman, G., Hussey, T., Lévêque, J.-L., & Pineau, P. (2003). Do cosmetics enhance Caucasian female facial attractiveness? International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 25(4), 199-205.
14. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161-176.
15. Perrett, D. I., Burt, D., Penton-Voak, I., Lee, K., Rowland, D., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behaviour. 20, 295-307.
16. Rose, D., & Pevalin, D. J. (2001). The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: Unifying official and sociological approaches to the conceptualisation and measurement of social class (ISER Working Paper No. 2001-4). Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
17. Schmitt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems and solutions. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 29(2), 274-279.