Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 107-131

  Chao, Angela ^a   Schor, Juliet B ^b  

^a Foremost Maritime Group   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conspicuous consumption; Consumer preferences; Cosmetics; Status consumption

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000369195     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00038-X     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abel A.B. Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80:1990;43-47.
2. Adult Personal Care Annual Report, 1989. MediaMark Survey, Mediamark Research, New York.
3. Adult Personal Care Annual Report, 1990. MediaMark Survey, Mediamark Research, New York.
4. Adult Personal Care Annual Report, 1991. MediaMark Survey, Mediamark Research, New York.
5. Alessie R., Kapteyn A. Habit formation, interdependent preferences and demographic effects in the almost ideal demand system. The Economic Journal. 101:1991;404-419.
6. Allen, M., 1981. Selling Dreams: Inside the Beauty Business. Simon & Schuster, New York.
7. Basmann, R. et al., 1988. A Note on Measuring Veblen's Theory of Conspicuous Consumption, Review of Economics and Statistics, 531-535.
8. Bearden W.O., Etzel M.J. Reference group influence and product and brand purchase decisions. J. of Consumer Research. 9:1982;183-194.
9. Bearden W.O., Netemeyer R.G., Teel J.E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. of Consumer Research. 15:1989;473-481.
10. Brown, C., 1994. The Standard of Living. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
11. Congleton R. Efficient status seeking: Externalities, and the evolution of status games. J. of Economic Behavior and Organization. 11:1989;175-190.
12. Consumer Reports, February 1988, June 1989, February 1991.
13. Deaton, A., 1992. Understanding Consumption. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
14. Duesenberry, J.S., 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
15. Easterlin R. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J. of Economic Behavior and Organisation. 27:1995;35-47.
16. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 7(2):1954;117-140.
17. Frank, R.H., 1985a. The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75 (1) 101-116.
18. Frank, R.H., 1985b. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Galli J. Keeping up with the Joneses: Consumption externalities, portfolio choice, and asset prices. J. of Money, Credit, and Banking. 26(1):1994;1-8.
20. Hirsch, F., 1976. The Social Limits to Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Holman, R., 1981. Product use as communication: A fresh appraisal of venerable topic. In: Enis, B.M., Roering, K.J. (Eds.), Review of Marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 106-119.
22. James J. Positional goods, conspicuous consumption, and the international demonstration effect reconsidered. World Development. 15(4):1987;449-462.
23. Kapteyn A., Herwaarden F.G.v. Interdependent welfare functions and optimal income distribution. J. of Public Economics. 14:1980;375-397.
24. Kosicki G. A test of the relative income hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal. 54:1987;422-433.
25. Kosicki G. Income redistribution and aggregate consumption: Implications for the relative income model. American Economist. 34:1990;40.
26. Leibenstein H. Bandwagon, snob and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. Quart. J. Econom. 64:1950;183-207.
27. Lovell, M., 1994. Private communication.
28. McAdams, R.H., 1992. Relative Preferences. The Yale Law Journal. The Yale Law Journal, New Haven, pp. 1-104.
29. McKnight, G., 1989. The Skin Game: The International Beauty Business Brutally Exposed. Sedgewick and Jackson, London.
30. Neumark, D., Postlewaite, A., 1995. Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women's Employment, NBER Working Paper #5044. NBER, Cambridge, MA.
31. Park C.W., Lessing V.P. Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influences. J. of Consumer Research. 4:1977;102-110.
32. Rauscher M. Demand for social status and the dynamics of consumer behavior. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 22:1993;105-113.
33. Schor, J.B., 1998. The Overspent American. Basic Books, New York.
34. Tefertiller, T., 1994. Children of Abundance: Exploring the Consumption Patterns of Teenage Girls. Undergraduate Thesis, Harvard University.
35. Veblen, T., 1967. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Penguin Books, New York (Originally published 1899).
36. Wolf, N., 1991. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. Doubleday, New York.