Time course of processes underlying picture and word evaluation: An event-related potential approach

Brain Topography

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 213-222

  Azizian, Allen ^a   Watson, Todd D ^b   Parvaz, Muhammad A ^c   Squires, Nancy K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; ERPs; P300; Picture; RAN; Word

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; TOPOGRAPHY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33644965648     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-006-0270-9     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alexander, J.E., Porjesz, B., Bauer, L.O., Kuperman, S., Morzorati, S., O'Connor, S.J., Rohrbaugh, J., Begleiter, H. and Polich, J. P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task. Psychophysiology, 1995, 32: 467-475.
2. Anderson, J. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 1989, 85: 249-277.
3. Berman, S., Friedman, D. and Cramer, M. A developmental study of event-related potentials during explicit and implicit memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1990, 10: 191-197.
4. Boiler, F. and De Reniz, E. Relationship between visual memory defects and hemispheric locus of lesion. Neurology, 1967, 17: 1052-1058.
5. Bright, P., Moss, H. and Tyler, L.K. Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain Language, 2004, 89: 417-432.
6. Budson, A.E., Droller, D.B., Dodson, C.S., Schacter, D.L., Rugg, M.D., Holcomb, P.J. and Daffner, K.R. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2005, 17: 1181-1193.
7. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B.C. and Romani, C. The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple Confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1990, 7: 161-189.
8. Denckla, M.B. Performance on color tasks in kindergarten children. Cortex, 1972, 8: 117-190.
9. De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Previdi, P., Sorgato, P. and Vescovini, E. The differential contribution of the verbal code in the course of visual learning: evidence from hemisphere-damaged patients. Cortex, 1981, 17: 447-452.
10. Duncan-Johnson, C.C. and Donchin, E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 1977, 14: 456-467.
11. Fabiani, M., Karis, D. and Donchin, E. P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm.Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 298-308.
12. Fraisse, Paul. Motor and verbal reaction times to words and drawings. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 12: 235-236.
13. Gainotti, G., Cappa, A., Perri, R. and Silveri, M.C. Disorders of verbal and pictorial memory in right and left brain-damaged patients. International Journal of Neuroscience, 1994, 78: 9-20.
14. Glanzer, M. and Clark, W.H. Accuracy of perceptual recall: An analysis of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 1: 289-299.
15. Glaser, W.R. Picture naming. Cognition, 1992, 42: 61-105.
16. Goldstein, B., Armstrong, C.L., Modestino, E., Ledakis, G., John, C. and Hunter, J.V. The impact of left and right intracranial tumors on picture and word recognition memory. Brain Cognition, 2004, 54: 1-6.
17. Grady, C.L., McIntosh, A.R., Rajah, M.N. and Craik, F.I. Neural correlates of the episodic encoding of pictures and words. Proceedings National Academy Science, 1998, 95: 2703-2708.
18. Greenham, S.L., Stelmack, R.M. and Campbell, K.B. Effects of attention and semantic relation on event-related potentials in a picture-word naming task. Biological Psychology, 2000, 55: 79-104.
19. Greenhouse, W.W and Geisser, S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959, 24: 95-112.
20. Hillis, A.E. and Caramazza, A. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implications from "optic aphasia". Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1995, 7: 457-478.
21. Kim, K.H., Yoon, H.W. and Park, H.W. Spatiotemporal brain activation pattern during word/picture perception by native Koreans. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 2004, 15: 1099-1103.
22. Johnson, C.J., Paivio, A. and Clark, J.M. Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 120: 113-139.
23. Kirchhoff, B.A., Wagner, A.D., Maril, A. and Stern, C.E. Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, 20: 6173-6180.
24. Köhler, S., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G. and McIntosh, A.R. Episodic encoding and recognition of pictures and words: role of the human medial temporal lobes. Acta. Psychologica., 2000, 105: 159-179.
25. Kok, A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 2001, 38: 557-577.
26. Kok, A. and Rooyakkers, J.A. ERPs to laterally presented pictures and words in a semantic categorization task. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 672-683.
27. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. and Donchin E.Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 1977, 197: 792-795.
28. Martin, A., Wiggs, C.L. and Weisberg, J. Modulation of human medial temporal lobe activity by form, meaning, and experience. Hippocampus, 1997, 7: 587-593.
29. McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 1981, 211: 77-80.
30. Nelson, T.O., Metzler, J. and Reed, D.A. Role of details in the long-term recognition of pictures and verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102: 184-186.
31. Noldy, N.E., Stelmack, R.M. and Campbell, K.B. Event-related potentials and recognition memory for pictures and words: the effects of intentional and incidental learning. Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 417-428.
32. Paivio, A. Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 45: 255-287.
33. Paivio, A. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
34. Paivio, A. Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
35. Paivio, A. and Begg, I. Pictures and words in visual search. Memory and Cognition, 1974, 2: 515-521.
36. Paivio, A. and Begg, I. Imagery and comprehension latencies as a function of sentence concreteness and structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 10: 408-412.
37. Paivio, A. and Csapo, K. Concrete image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80: 279-283.
38. Paivio, A., Rogers, T.B. and Smythe, P.C. Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science, 1968, 11: 137-138.
39. Polich, J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986, 63: 2551-2559.
40. Postman, L. Picture-word differences in the acquisition and retention of paired associates. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978, 4: 146-157.
41. Potter, M.C. and Faulconer, B.A. Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 1975, 253: 437-438.
42. Reinholz, J. and Pollmann, S. Differential activation of object-selective visual areas by passive viewing of pictures and words. Cognitive Brain Research, 2005, 24: 702-714.
43. Saffran, E.M., Coslett, H.B., Martin, N. and Boronat, C.B. Access to knowledge from pictures but not words in a patient with progressive fluent aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2003, 18: 725-757.
44. Salmelin, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O.V. and Sams, M. Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature, 1994, 31: 463-465.
45. Seifert, L.S. Activating Representations in Permanent Memory: Different Benefits for Pictures and Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 1997, 23: 1106-1121.
46. Sevostianov, A., Horwitz B., Nechaev, V., Williams, R., Fromm, S. and Braun, A.R. fMRI study comparing names versus pictures of objects. Human Brain Mapping, 2002, 16: 168-175.
47. Simos, P.G. and Molfese, D.L. Event-related potentials in a two-choice task involving within-form comparisons of pictures and words. International Journal of Neuroscience, 1997, 90: 233-253.
48. Shepard, R. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory, 1967, 6: 156-163.
49. Shiffrin, R.M. and Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychology Review, 1977, 84: 127-190.
50. Smith, M.L. Memory disorders associated with temporal-lobe lesions. In: F. Boller and J. Glafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, V3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989: 91-106.
51. Smith, M.C. and Magee, L.E. Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 109: 373-392.
52. Standing, L., Conezio, J. and Haber, R.N. Perception and memory for pictures: single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19: 73-74.
53. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J. and John, E.R. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 1965, 150: 1187-1188.
54. Theios, J. and Amrhein, P.C. Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review, 1989, 96: 5-24.
55. Warrington, E.K. The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 27: 635-657.
56. Warrington, E.K. and Shallice, T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 1984, 107: 829-854.
57. Watson, T.D., Azizian, A., Berry, S. and Squires, N.K. Event-related potentials as an index of similarity between words and pictures. Psychophysiology, 2005, 42: 361-368.
58. Whitehouse, J.P. Imagery and verbal encoding in left and right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 1981, 14: 315-332.
59. Zhang, X.L., Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B. and Litke, A. Visual object priming differs from visual word priming: an ERP study. Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology, 1997, 102(3): 200-215.