Exploring the uses and usefulness of ACTFL oral proficiency ratings and standards in college foreign language departments

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 572-581

  Norris, John M ^a   Pfeiffer , Peter C ^b  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644862774     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02147.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (1986). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.
2. Barnes, B., Klee, C, & Wakefield, R. (1990). A funny thing happened on the way to the language requirement. ADFL Bulletin, 22(1), 35-39.
3. Breiner-Sanders, K., Lowe, Jr., P., Miles, J., & Swender, E. (2000). ACTFL proficiency guidelines-speaking (revised, 1999). Foreign Language Annals, 33, 13-18.
4. Brod, R., & Huber, B. J. (1996). The MLA survey of foreign language entrance and degree requirements, 1994-95. ADFL Bulletin, 28(1), 36-43.
5. Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
6. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. D. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment: Advantages and disadvantages. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653-75.
7. Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholaship (pp. 262-95). New York: The Modern Language Association.
8. Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419-37.
9. Byrnes, H. & Kord, S. (2001) Developing literacy and literary competence: Challenges for FL departments. In V Scott & H. Tucker (eds.), SLA and the Literature Classroom: Fostering Dialogues (pp. 31-69). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
10. California State University Monterey Bay. (2003). University learning requirements. Retrieved April 01, 2003 from http://csumb.edu/academic/ulr/ulr/ language.html.
11. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (2003). Minnesota language proficiency assessments. Retrieved July 24, 2003 from http://carla.acad.umn.edu/ MLPA.html.
12. Center for Applied Linguistics. (1995). German speaking test rater training kit. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Center for Applied Linguistics. (1996). German speaking test. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Cizek, G. (ed.) (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Clark, J. L. D. (1988). Validation of a tape-mediated ACTFL/ILR-scale based test of Chinese speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 5, 197-205.
16. Erwin, T., & Wise, S. (2001). Standard setting. New Directions for Institutional Research, 110, 55-64.
17. Fleck, J. (1970). The foreign language requirement: A panel discussion, 1969 AATG Meeting, New Orleans. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 3(2), 101-4
18. Foreign Language Annals. (2002). Interview with Robert Slater, Director, National Security Education Program (NSEP). Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 258.
19. Freed, B. E (1981). Establishing proficiency-based language requirements. ADFL Bulletin, 13(2), 6-12.
20. Freed, B. E (1984). Proficiency in context: The Pennsylvania experience. In SJ. Savignon & M.S. Berns (eds.), Initiatives in communicative language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 211-40). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Freed, B. E (1987). Preliminary impressions of the effects of a proficiency-based language requirement. Foreign Language Annals, 20, 139-46.
22. Georgetown University German Department. (2003) Developing multiple literacies. Retrieved April 01, 2003 from http://www.georgetown.edu/departments/ german/programs/curriculum/.
23. Grosse, C. U. (1992, November). Testing the limits of proficiency: The ACTFL OPI and FL departments. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Rosemont, IL.
24. Huber, B.J. (1992). Characteristics of foreign language requirements at U.S.colleges and universities: Findings from the MLAs 1987-89 survey of foreign language programs. ADFL Bulletin, 24(1), 8-16.
25. Kenyon, D., & Tschirner, E. (2000). The rating of direct and semi-direct oral proficiency interviews: Comparing performance at lower proficiency levels. Modem Language Journal, 84, 85-101.
26. Klayman, N. (1978). Views on the foreign language requirement in higher education. Modern Language Journal, 62(5-6), 235-38.
27. Lange, D. (1990). Assessing language proficiency for credit in higher education. ERIC Digest, ED321588.
28. Magnan, S. (1986). Assessing speaking proficiency in the undergraduate curriculum: Data from French. Foreign Language Annals, 19, 429-38.
29. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1999). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: Author.
30. Norris, J. M. (1996). A validation study of the ACTFL Guidelines and the German Speaking Test. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu.
31. Norris, J. M. (1997). The German Speaking Test: Utility and caveats. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 30, 148-58.
32. Norris, J. M. (2000). Purposeful language assessment. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 18-23.
33. Norris, J. M. (2001). Use of address terms on the German Speaking Test. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 248-82). New York: âCambridge University Press.
34. Norris, J. M. (2004). Validity evaluation in foreign language assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu.
35. Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Yoshioka, J. K. (1998). Developing second language performance assessment. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
36. Pfeiffer, E (2002). Preparing graduate students to teach language and literature in a foreign language department. ADFL Bulletin, 34, 11-14.
37. Schulz, R.A. (1988). Proficiency-based foreign language requirements: A plan for action. ADFL Bulletin, 19(2), 24-28.
38. Shohamy, E. (1994). The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests. Language Testing, 11, 99-123.
39. Stansfield, C. (1996). SOPI test development handbook. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
40. Stansfield, C, & Kenyon, D. (1992). Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview. System, 20, 347-64.
41. Stansfield, C, & Kenyon, D. (1993). Development and validity of the Hausa Speaking Test with the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 4, 5-31.
42. Stokes, G. (2002). Guidelines for foreign language and literature teaching responsibilities. Retrieved April 01, 2003 from http://cohesion.rice. edu/humanities/depts.cfm?docid=l426.
43. Thompson, I. (1995). A study of interrater reliability of the ACTFL Proficiency Interview in five European languages: Data from English, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 407-22.
44. Thompson, I. (1996). Assessing foreign language skills: Data from Russian. Modern Language Journal, 80, 47-65.
45. Tschimer, E. (1992). Oral proficiency base lines for first and second year college German. Unterrichtspraxis, 25, 10-14.
46. Tschimer, E. (1996). Scope and sequence: Rethinking beginning foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 80, 1-14.
47. Tschimer, E., & Heilenman, L. (1998). Reasonable expectations: Oral proficiency goals for intermediate-level students of German. Modern Language Journal, 82, 147-58.
48. Voorhees, R. (2001). Competency-based learning models: A necessary future. New Directions for Institutional Research, 110,5-13.
49. Weber State University (2002). Catalog. Retrieved April 01, 2003 from http://documents.weber.edu/catalog/0203/-forlngb.htm
50. Weber State University Foreign Language and Literatures Department (2003). Foreign language requirements for the bachelors of arts degree. Retrieved April 01, 2003 from http://documents.weber.edu/catalog/0203/-forlngd. htm.
51. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Wolfe, W. J. (1959). Foreign language entrance and degree requirements for the B.S. degree. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 74(4 pt. 2), 34-14.