Intuitive decision making in complex situations: Somatic markers in an artificial grammar learning task

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 297-305

  Bierman, Dick J ^a   Destrebecqz, Arnaud ^b   Cleeremans, Axel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PUNISHMENT; REWARD; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTEER; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LINGUISTICS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33644848987     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.297     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BECHARA, A., DAMASIO, H., TRANEL, D., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295.
2. BECHARA, A., DAMASIO, H., TRANEL, D., & DAMASIO, A. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 159-162.
3. BECHARA, A., TRANEL, D., DAMASIO, H., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215-225.
4. BERRY, D. C., & DIENES, Z. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
5. BIERMAN, D. J. (2005). Using an eye tracker to measure the three factors underlying intuitive decision making. Manuscript in preparation.
6. CHAN, C. (1992). Implicit cognitive processes: Theoretical issues and applications in computer systems design. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford.
7. CHEESMAN, J., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387-395.
8. CLEEREMANS, A., DESTREBECQZ, A., & BOYER, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416.
9. CLOTFELTER, C. T., & COOK, P. J. (1993). The "gambler's fallacy" in lottery play. Management Science, 39, 1521-1525.
10. DAMASIO, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 351, 1413-1420.
11. DIENES, Z., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (Vol. 5, pp. 107-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. DIENES, Z., ALTMANN, G. T. M., KWAN, L., & GOODE, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
13. DIENES, Z., & BERRY, D. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3-23.
14. DULANY, D., CARLSON, R., & DEWEY, J. (1984). A case of syntactic learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
15. JIMÉNEZ, L. (1997). Implicit learning: Conceptual and methodological issues. Psychologica Belgica, 37, 9-28.
16. JIMÉNEZ, L., MÉNDEZ, C., & CLEEREMANS, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 948-969.
17. KNOWLTON, B. J., SQUIRE, L. R., & GLUCK, M. A. (1994). Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory, 1, 106-120.
18. LOVIBOND, P. F., & SHANKS, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
19. MAIA, T. V., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa Gambling Task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16075-16080.
20. MAIA, T. V., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: Still many questions but no answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 162-164.
21. NISBETT, R. E., & WILSON, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can do: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
22. REBER, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
23. REINGOLD, E. M., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 563-575.
24. REINGOLD, E. M., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind & Language, 5, 9-28.
25. SHANKS, D. R., & JOHNSTONE, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 533-572). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. SHANKS, D. R., & ST. JOHN, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
27. SNODGRASS, M., SHEVRIN, H., & KOPKA, M. (1993). The mediation of intentional judgments by unconscious perceptions: The influences of task strategy, task preference, word meaning, and motivation. Consciousness & Cognition, 2, 169-193.