High spectral and spatial resolution mri of breat lesions: Preliminary clinical experience

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 186, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 30-37

  Medved, Milica ^a   Newstead, Gillian M ^a   Abe, Hiroyuki ^a   Zamora, Marta A ^a   Olopade, Olufunmilayo I ^a   Karczmar, Gregory S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; High spectral and spatial resolution spectroscopic imaging; MRI; Screening

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33644838471     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1704     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Drew PJ. Current applications and future direction of MR mammography. Br J Cancer 2003; 88:4-10
2. Kinkel K, Vlastos G. MR imaging: breast cancer staging and screening. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20:187-196
3. Esserman L, Wolverton D, Hylton N. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management: current role and new applications. Endocr Relat Cancer 2002; 9:141-153
4. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43
5. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110
6. Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Boné B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:379-386
7. Wedegärtner U, Bick U, Wörtler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1645-1650
8. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Vainio J, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 216:545-553
9. Sinha S, Sinha U. Functional magnetic resonance of human breast tumors: diffusion and perfusion imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 980:95-115
10. McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, Manduca A, Hartmann LC, Ehman RL. MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. AJR 2002; 178:1411-1417
11. Yuen S, Yamada K, Kinosada Y, et al. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:56-65
12. Larkman DJ, deSouza NM, Bydder M, Hajnal JV. An investigation into the use of sensitivity-encoded techniques to increase temporal resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:329-335
13. Fletcher DW, Haselgrove JC, Bolinger L. High-resolution imaging using Hadamard encoding. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17:1457-1468
14. Alterson R, Plewes DB. Bilateral symmetry analysis of breast MRI. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48:3431-3443
15. Kuperman VY, Alley MT. Differentiation between the effects of T1 and T2* shortening in contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:172-176
16. Medved M, Du W, Zamora MA, et al. The effect of varying spectral resolution on the quality of high spectral and spatial resolution magnetic resonance images of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18:442-448
17. Du W, Du YP, Bick U, et al. Breast MR imaging with high spectral and spatial resolutions: preliminary experience. Radiology 2002; 224:577-585
18. Medved M, Newstead GM, Fan X, et al. Fourier components of inhomogeneously broadened water resonances in breast: a new source of MRI contrast. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52:193-196
19. Kovar DA, Al-Hallaq HA, Zamora MA, River JN, Karczmar GS. Fast spectroscopic imaging of water and fat resonances to improve the quality of MR images. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:269-275
20. Mansfield P. Spatial mapping of the chemical shift in NMR. Magn Reson Med 1984; 1:370-386
21. Karczmar GS, Fan X, Al-Hallaq H, et al. Functional and anatomic imaging of tumor vasculature: high-resolution MR spectroscopic imaging combined with a superparamagnetic contrast agent. Acad Radiol 2002; 9[suppl 1 ]:S115-S118
22. Karczmar GS, Fan X, Al-Hallaq HA, et al. Uptake of a superparamagnetic contrast agent imaged by MR with high spectral and spatial resolution. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:633-639
23. Naritomi H, Kanashiro M, Sasaki M, Kuribayashi Y, Sawada T. In vivo measurements of intra- and extracellular Na+ and water in the brain and muscle by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with shift reagent. Biophys J 1987; 52:611-616
24. Zhong K, Li X, Shachar-Hill Y, Picart F, Wishnia A, Springer CS Jr. Magnetic susceptibility shift selected imaging (MESSI) and localized (1)H(2)O spectroscopy in living plant tissues. NMR Biomed 2000; 13:392-397
25. Gambarota G, Cairns BE, Berde CB, Mulkern RV. Osmotic effects on the T2 relaxation decay of in vivo muscle. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46:592-599
26. Peled S, Cory DG, Raymond SA, Kirschner DA, Jolesz FA. Water diffusion, T(2), and compartmentation in frog sciatic nerve. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:911-918
27. Brindle KM, Brown FF, Campbell ID, Grathwohl C, Kuchel PW. Application of spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance to whole-cell systems: membrane transport. Biochem J 1979; 180:37-44
28. Quirk JD, Bretthorst GL, Duong TQ, et al. Equilibrium water exchange between the intra- and extracellular spaces of mammalian brain. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50:493-499