Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 347-352

  Kogure, Satoshi ^a   Toda, Y ^a   Tsukahara, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCOTOMA; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTOMA; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33644660462     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077065     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Sekuler R, Blake R. Central visual pathways. In: Sekuler R, eds. Perception. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1994:102-79.
2. Chaturvedi N, Hedley-Whyte ET, Dreyer EB. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:182-8.
3. Dandona L, Hendrichson A, Quigley HA, Selective effects of experimental glaucoma on axonal transport by retinal geniculate nucleus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:1593-9.
4. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:484-91.
5. Anderson RS, O'Brien C. Psychophysical evidence for a selective loss of M ganglion cells in glaucoma. Vis Res 1997;37:1079-83.
6. Johnson CA, Early losses of visual function in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:359-70.
7. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, et al. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:645-50.
8. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, et al. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:651-6.
9. Falcao-Reis F, O'Donoghue E, Bucetti R, et al. Peripheral contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74:712-16.
10. Kogure S, Chiba T, Saito S, et al. Predicting glaucomatous sensitivity loss using perimetric color saturation test. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:537-42.
11. Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:35-9.
12. Kalaboukhova L, Lindblom B, Frequency doubling technology and high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:247-52.
13. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1994;3:s32-s44.
14. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am A [A] 1966;56:1628-33.
15. Kogure S, Membrey WL, Fitzke FW, et al. Effect of decreased retinal illumination on frequency doubling technology. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000;44:489-93.
16. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:413-25.
17. Kogure S, Toda Y, Crabb D, et al. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:604-8.
18. Landers JA, Goldberg I, Graham SL. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1705-10.
19. Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb C. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1350-61.
20. Horn FK, Wakili N, Junemann AM, et al. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:658-65.
21. Landers JA, Goldberg I, Graham SL. Comparison of clinical optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002;30:338-42.
22. Soliman MA, de Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, et al. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 2002;109:444-54.
23. Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinall P, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:327-32.
24. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment or retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1993-2003.
25. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, et al. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:188-97.
26. Serguhn S, Spiegel D. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:351-5.
27. Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Kunimatsu S, et al. Frequency doubling technology and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopic optic disc analysis in open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defects. J Glaucoma 2001;10:256-60.
28. Yamashiro H, Tanaka M, Saito M, et al. [The ability of frequency doubling technology to detect abnormality of visual function in early glaucoma]. [Japanese]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2001;105:488-93.
29. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:314-22.
30. Fabre K, Michiels I, Zeyen T. The sensitivity and specificity of TOP, FDP and GDX in screening for early glaucoma. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2000;275:17-23.
31. Landers J, Goldberg I, Graham S. A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000;28:248-52.
32. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1783-90.
33. Kondo Y, Yamamoto T, Sato Y, et al. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. J Glaucoma 1998;7:261-5.
34. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:819-29.
35. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1009-17.
36. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;13:863-71.
37. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:571-81.
38. Horikoshi N, Osako M, Tamura Y, et al. Comparison of detectability of visual field abnormality by frequency doubling technology in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:503-9.