Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 285-294

  Laneau, Johan ^a,b   Wouters, Jan ^a  

^a KU LEUVEN UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Monopolar; Multichannel; Place pitch; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MULTICHANNEL RECORDER; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4944230723     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4049-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BLACK RC, CLARK GM. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:868-874, 1980.
2. BUSBY PA, CLARK GM. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patients. Audiology 35:8-22, 1996.
3. BUSBY, PA, WHITFORD LA, BLAME PJ, RICHARDSON LM, CLARK GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:2658-2669, 1994.
4. CARLYON RP, DEEKS JM. Limitations on rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1009-1025, 2002.
5. COHEN LT, BUSBY PA, CLARK GM. Cochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audiol. Neurootol. 1:278-292, 1996a.
6. COHEN LT, BUSBY PA, WHITFORD LA, CLARK GM. Cochlear implant place psychophysics 1. Pitch estimation with deeply inserted electrodes. Audiol. Neurootol. 1:265-277, 1996b.
7. COHEN LT, SAUNDERS E, CLARK GM. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear. Res. 155:63-81, 2001.
8. COLLINS LM, THROCKMORTON CS. Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2353-2365, 2000.
9. COLLINS LM, ZWOLAN TA, WAKEFIELD CH. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:440-455, 1997.
10. GEURTS L, WOUTERS J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:713-726, 2001.
11. HENRY BA, MCKAY CM, MCDERMOTT HJ, CLARK GM. The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:1269-1280, 2000.
12. LEVITT H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:467-477, 1971.
13. LYZENGA J, HORST JW. Frequency discrimination of band-limited harmonic complexes related to vowel formants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1943-1955, 1995.
14. LYZENGA J, HORST JW. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1755-1767, 1997.
15. MACMILLIAN NA, CREELMAN CD. Detection theory; A user's guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
16. MCDERMOTT HJ, McKAY CM. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:155-162, 1994.
17. MCDERMOTT HJ, MCKAY CM. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1622-1631, 1997.
18. McKAY CM, O'BRIEN A, JAMES CJ. Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 136:159-164, 1999.
19. MCKAY CM. Place, temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent? ARLO 1:25-30, 2000.
20. MORRIS DJ, PFINGST BE. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1:211-223, 2000.
21. NELSON DA, VANTASELL DJ, SCHRODER AC, SOLI S, LEVINE S. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1987-1999, 1995.
22. Nelson DA. Spatial selectivity, neurotopicity and tonotopicity in cochlear implant listeners. Abstract presented at the 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA.
23. PFINGST BE, HOLLOWAY LA, ZWOLAN TA, COLLINS LM. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 134:105-115, 1999.
24. PFINGST BE, FRANCK KH, Xu L, BAUER EM, ZWOLAN TA. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:87-103, 2001.
25. PIJL S. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear 18:364-372, 1997.
26. PIJL S, SCHWARZ DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:886-895, 1995.
27. SHANNON RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157-189, 1983.
28. TONG YC, CLARK GM. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1881-1888, 1985.
29. TONG YC, CLARK GM, BLAMEY PJ, BUSBY PA, DOWELL RC. Psychophysical studies for 2 multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:153-160, 1982.
30. TONG YC, BLAMEY DJ, DOWELL RC, CLARK GM. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:73-80, 1983.
31. TOWNSHEND B, COTTER N, VANCOMPERNOLLE D, WHITE RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:106-115, 1987.
32. WOUTERS J. Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrie. Logopedie 7:28-33, 1994.
33. ZWICKER E. Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear's frequency analysis. In: PLOMP R, SMOORENBURG GF (eds) Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. Leiden, Sijthoff, pp 376-396, 1970.
34. ZWOLAN TA, KILENY PR, ASHBAUGH C, TELIAN SA. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: Bipolar versus monopolar activation. Am. J. Otol. 17:717-723, 1996.
35. ZWOLAN TA, COLLINS LM, WAKEFIELD GH. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:3673-3685, 1997.