Hybrids in real time

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 46-56

  Baroni, Mihaela ^a   Semple, Charles ^a   Steel, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Directed acyclic graph; Hybrid species; Reticulate evolution; Subtree prune and regraft

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; TIME;

EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644600474     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150500431197     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bafna, V., and V. Bansal. 2004. The number of recombination events in a sample history: Conflict graph and lower bounds. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 1:78-90.
2. Bang-Jensen, J., and G. Gutin. 2001. Digraphs: Theory, algorithms and applications. Springer-Verlag, London.
3. Baroni, M. 2004. Hybrid phylogenies: A graph-based approach to represent reticulate evolution. PhD thesis. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
4. Baroni, M., S. Grünewald, V. Moulton, and C. Semple. 2005. Bounding the number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history. J. Math. Biol. 51:171-182.
5. Baroni, M., C. Semple, and M. A. Steel. 2004. A framework for representing reticulate evolution. Ann. Combin. 8:391-408.
6. Bordewich, M., and C. Semple. 2004. On the computational complexity of the rooted subtree prune and regraft distance. Ann. Combin. 8:409-423.
7. Bordewich, M., and C. Semple. 2005. Computing the minimum number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history. Submitted manuscript (Departmental report UCDMS2004/21, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand).
8. Fisher, F.J.F. 1965. The alpine Ranunculi of New Zealand. DSIR publishing, New Zealand.
9. Gusfield, D. 2004. A fundamental decomposition theory for phylogenetic networks and incompatible characters. Technical Report UC-Davis CSE-2004-32.
10. Gusfield, D., S. Eddhu, and C. Langley. 2004. Optimal, efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic networks with constrained recombination. J. Bioinf. Comput. Biol. 2:173-213.
11. Holder, M. T., J. A. Anderson, and A. K. Holloway. 2001. Difficulties in detecting hybridization. Syst. Biol. 50:978-982.
12. Holland, B., K. Huber, V. Moulton and P. J. Lockhart. 2004. Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1459-1461.
13. Huson, D. H., T. Dezulian, T. Kloepper, and M. A. Steel. 2004. Phylogenetic super-networks from partial trees. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 1:151-158.
14. Huson, D. H., T. Kloepper, P. J. Lockhart, and M. A. Steel. 2005. Reconstruction of reticulate networks from gene trees. Pages 233-249 in Proceedings of RECOMB 2005 (S. Miyano et al., eds.). LNBI 3500, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Huydn, T.N.D., J. Jansson, N.B. Nguyen, and W.-K. Sung. 2005. Constructing a smallest refining galled phylogenetic network. Pages 265-280 in Proceedings of RECOMB 2005 (S. Miyano et al., eds.). LNBI 3500, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. Legendre, P., and V. Makarenkov. 2002. Reconstruction of biogeographic and evolutionary networks using reticulograms. Syst. Biol. 51:199-216.
17. Lockhart, P. J., P. A. McLenachan, D. Havell, D. Glenny D. Huson, and U. Jensen. 2001. Phylogeny, radiation, and transoceanic dispersal of New Zealand alpine buttercups: Molecular evidence under split decomposition. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88:458-477.
18. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
19. Moret, B. M. E., L. Nakhleh, T. Warnow, C. R. Linder, A. Tholse, A. Padolina, J. Sun, and R. Timme. 2004. Phylogenetic networks: modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 1:1-11.
20. Song, Y., and J. Hein. 2004. On the minimum number of recombination events in the evolutionary history of DNA sequences. J. Math. Biol. 48:160-186.