Discrete choice modelling of urban housing markets: A critical review and an application

Urban Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 559-581

  Yates, Judith ^a   Mackay, Daniel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL ANALYSIS; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES; SYDNEY;

EID: 33644600067     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500533695     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Ahmad, N. (1994) A joint model of tenure choice and demand for housing in the city of Karachi Urban Studies, 31(10), pp. 1691 - 1706.
2. Badcock, B. and Beer, A.(2000) Home Truths, Property Ownership and Housing Wealth in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.(1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
4. Boehm, T. (1981) Tenure choice and expected mobility Journal of Urban Economics, 10, pp. 375 - 389.
5. Boehm, T. (1982) A hierarchical model of housing choice Urban Studies, 19, pp. 17 - 31.
6. Borsch-Supan, A.(1987) Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Borsch-Supan, A. (1990) Panel data of housing choices Regional Science and Urban Economics, 20, pp. 65 - 82.
8. Borsch-Supan, A. and Pitkin, J. (1988) On discrete choice models of housing demand Journal of Urban Economics, 24, pp. 153 - 172.
9. Cho, C.-J. (1997) Joint choice of tenure and dwelling type: A multinomial logit analysis for the city of Chongju Urban Studies, 34(9), pp. 1459 - 1473.
10. Clark, W. and Onaka, J. (1985) An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice Environment and Planning, 17, pp. 915 - 930.
11. Daly, A. (1987) Estimating tree logit models Transportation Research B, 21B, pp. 251 - 267.
12. Daly, A. (2001) Alternative tree logit models: Comments on a paper of Koppelman and Wen Transportation Research B, 35B, pp. 717 - 724.
13. Earnhart, D. (2002) Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis Journal of Urban Economics, 51, pp. 143 - 169.
14. Elder, H. and Zumpano, L. (1991) Tenure Choice, Housing Demand and Residential Location Journal of Real Estate Research, 6(3), pp. 341 - 356.
15. Gibb, K. and Meen, G. and Mackay, D. (2001) Choice and demand in a social housing system: Policy simulations for Glasgow. (mimeograph)
16. Greene, W.(2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th edition. New York: Macmillan.
17. Henderson, J. and Ioannides, Y. (1986) Tenure choice and the demand for housing Economica, 53, pp. 231 - 246.
18. Hensher, D.(1980) The demand for location and accommodation - a qualitative choice approach in a policy formulating environment in housing economics. In Housing Economics. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
19. Hensher, D. (1999) HEV choice models as a search engine for the specification of nested logit tree structures Marketing Letters, 10(4), pp. 339 - 349.
20. Hensher, D. and Greene, W. (2002) Specification and Estimation of the Nested Logit Model: Alternative Normalisations Transportation Research, 36(1), pp. 1 - 17.
21. Ioannides, Y. and Kan, K. (1996) Structural estimation of residential mobility and housing tenure choice Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), pp. 335 - 363.
22. Kain, J. and Apgar, W.(1977) The Modeling of Neighbourhood Change. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Kan, K. (2000) Dynamic modeling of housing tenure choice Journal of Urban Economics, 48, pp. 46 - 69.
24. King, M. (1980) An econometric model of tenure choice and demand for housing as a joint decisions Journal of Public Economics, 14, pp. 137 - 159.
25. Koppelman, F. and Sethi, V.(2000) Closed Form Discrete Choice Models. In Handbook of Transport Modeling. (pp. 211 - 228). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Koppelman, F. and Wen, C.-H. (1998) Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation Transportation Research B, 32(5), pp. 289 - 298.
27. Koppelman, F. and Sethi, V. and Wen, C.-H. (2001) Alternative nested logit models: A response to comments by Andrew Daly Transportation Research B, 35, pp. 725 - 729.
28. Krumm, R. (1984) Household Tenure Choice and Migration Journal of Urban Economics, 16, pp. 259 - 271.
29. Lee, L.-F. and Trost, R. (1978) Estimation of some limited dependent variable models with application to housing demand Journal of Econometrics, 8, pp. 357 - 382.
30. Louviere, J. and Hensher, D. and Swait, J.(2000) State Choice Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Louviere, J. and Meyer, R. and Bunch and (1999) Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes Marketing Letters, 10(3), pp. 187 - 217.
32. Maclennan, D. and Tu, Y. (1996) Economic perspectives on the structure of local housing systems Housing Studies, 11(3), pp. 387 - 406.
33. McFadden, D. (2001) Economic choices American Economic Review, 91(3), pp. 351 - 378.
34. Ortuzar, J. (2001) On the development of the nested logit model Transportation Research B, 35, pp. 213 - 216.
35. Quigley, J. (1976) Housing demand in the short run: An analysis of polytomous choice Explorations in Economic Research, 3(1), pp. 76 - 102.
36. Quigley, J. (1985) Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, pp. 41 - 63. [reprinted in J. Quigley (Ed.), (1998) The Economics of Housing, Vol. I, pp. 553-575. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar]
37. Rapaport, C. (1997) Housing demand and community choice: An empirical analysis Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp. 243 - 260.
38. Rosen, H. (1979) Housing decisions and the U.S. income tax Journal of Public Economics, 11, pp. 1 - 23.
39. Skaburskis, A. (1999) Modelling the choice of tenure and building type Urban Studies, 36(13), pp. 2199 - 2215.
40. Tu, Y. and Goldfinch, J. (1996) A two-stage housing choice forecasting model Urban Studies, 33(3), pp. 517 - 537.
41. Wen, C.-H. and Koppelman, F. (2001) The generalised nested logit model Transportation Research B, 35, pp. 627 - 641.
42. Yates, J. (2000) Is Australia's home ownership rate really stable? Urban Studies, 37(2), pp. 319 - 342.
43. Yates, J. (2001) The rhetoric and reality of housing choice: The role of urban consolidation Urban Policy and Research, 19(4), pp. 491 - 527.
44. Zorn, P. (1988) An analysis of household mobility and tenure choice: An empirical study of Korea Journal of Urban Economics, 24, pp. 113 - 128.