On the development of the nested logit model

Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 213-216

  De Ortúzar, Juan Dios ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOGIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035165591     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(00)00033-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ben-Akiva, M.E., 1973. Structure of passenger travel demand models. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Ben-Akiva, M.E., 1974. Structure of passenger travel demand models. Transportation Research Record 526, 26-42.
3. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R., 1979. Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Hensher, D.A., Stopher, P.R. (Eds.), Behavioural Travel Modelling. Croom Helm, London.
4. Daly, A.J., 1987. Estimating 'tree' logit models. Transportation Research B 21, 251-268.
5. Daly, A.J., Zachary, S., 1976. Improved multiple choice models. In: Proceedings of the Fourth PTRC Summer Annual Meeting. University of Warwick, England, 12-16 July 1976.
6. Daly, A.J., Zachary, S., 1978. Improved multiple choice models. In: Hensher, D.A., Dalvi, M.Q. (Eds.), Determinants of Travel Choice. Saxon House, Sussex
7. Domencich, T.A., McFadden, D., 1975. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
8. Hensher, D.A., 1998. Understanding travel behaviour: some appealing research directions. Invitational Paper Presented at The University of Oxford RAC/TSU Seminar Series Whither Transport Studies? Mapping the Key Areas for Future Transport Research. Hertford College, Oxford, 1 July 1998.
9. Manheim, M.L., 1973. Practical implications of some fundamental properties of travel demand models. Highway Research Record 422, 21-38.
10. McFadden, D., 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York.
11. McFadden, D., 1978. Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist, A., Lundqvist, L., Snickars, F., Weibull, J.W. (Eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
12. Senior, M.L., Williams, H.C.W.L., 1977. Model based transport policy assessment I: the use of alternative forecasting models. Traffic Engineering and Control 18, 402-406.
13. Williams, H.C.W.L., 1976. The formation of travel demand models and user benefit measures. In: Conference on Urban Transport Planning. University of Leeds, 29 March-1 April 1976.
14. Williams, H.C.W.L., 1977. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A 9, 285-344.
15. Williams, H.C.W.L., Ortuzar, J. de D., 1982. Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models. Transportation Research B 16, 167-219.
16. Williams, H.C.W.L., Senior, M.L., 1977. Model based transport policy assessment II: removing fundamental inconsistencies from the models. Traffic Engineering and Control 18, 464-469.
17. Williams, H.C.W.L., Senior, M.L., 1978. Accessibility, spatial interaction and thé spatial benefit analysis of land use -transportation plans. In: Karlqvist, A., Lundqvist, L., Snickars, F., Weibull, J.W. (Eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
18. Wilson, A.G., 1974. Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning. Wiley, Chichester.
19. Wilson, A.G., Hawkins, A.F., Hill, G.J., Wagon, D.J., 1969. Calibration and testing of the SELNEC transport model. Regional Studies 3, 337-350.