Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education

Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth

Volumn 16, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-38

  Siegel, Donald S ^a   Phan, Phillip H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644548279     PISSN: 10484736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(05)16001-9     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Aigner D.J., Lovell C.A.K., and Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions. Journal of Econometrics 6 (1977) 21-37
2. Association for University Technology Managers (AUTM). AUTM Licensing Survey: Fiscal Year 2003 (2004), AUTM, Chicago, IL
3. Audretsch D. Is university entrepreneurship different? (2000), Indiana University, Mimeo
4. Bercovitz J., and Feldman M. Academic entrepreneurs: Social learning and participation in university technology transfer (2004), University of Toronto, Mimeo
5. Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Feller I., and Burton R. Organizational structure as determinants of academic patent and licensing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2001) 21-35
6. Blundell R., Griffith R., and Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal 105 (1995) 333-344
7. Burt R.S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition (1992), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Carlsson B., and Fridh A. Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12 (2002) 199-232
9. Chapple W., Lockett A., Siegel D.S., and Wright M. Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer offices in the U.K.: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 369-384
10. Clark B.R. Creating entrepreneurial universities; organizational pathways of transformation (1998), IAU Press, New York
11. Degroof J.J., and Roberts E.B. Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructure for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3-4 (2004) 327-357
12. Di Gregorio D., and Shane S. Why do some universities generate more startups than others?. Research Policy 32 (2003) 209-227
13. Ferguson R., and Olofsson C. Science park and the development of new technology-based firms: Location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer 29 1 (2004) 5-17
14. Foltz J., Bradford B., and Kim K. Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness 16 1 (2000) 82-95
15. Franklin S., Wright M., and Lockett A. Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 1-2 (2001) 127-141
16. Friedman J., and Silberman J. University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer 28 1 (2003) 81-85
17. Jensen R., and Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review 91 1 (2001) 240-259
18. Jensen R., Thursby J.G., and Thursby M.C. The disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the S**t we get to work with. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1271-1300
19. Lach S., and Schankerman M. Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. Journal of the European Economic Association 2 2-3 (2004) 252-264
20. Lindelof P., and Loftsen H. Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden: Implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics 20 3 (2003) 245-258
21. Lindelof P., and Loftsen H. Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3-4 (2004) 311-326
22. Link A.N., and Link K.R. On the growth of U.S. science parks. Journal of Technology Transfer 28 (2003) 81-85
23. Link A.N., and Scott J.T. Science parks and the generation of university-based knowledge: An exploratory study. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1323-1356
24. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2004). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Paper presented at the technology transfer society meetings, Albany, NY, September 30th, 2004.
25. Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). Generating science-based growth: An econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. European Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
26. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2004). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies. Paper presented at the technology transfer society meetings, Albany, NY, September 30th, 2004.
27. Lockett A., Wright M., and Franklin S. Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics 20 (2003) 185-201
28. Louis K.S., Blumenthal D., Gluck M.E., and Stoto M.A. Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (1989) 110-131
29. Markman G., Phan P., Balkin D., and Gianiodis P. Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3-4 (2004) 353-364
30. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., & Gianiodis, P. (2004b). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Paper presented at the technology transfer society meetings, Albany, NY, September 30th, 2004.
31. Markman G., Phan P., Balkin D., and Gianiodis P. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing 20 2 (2005) 241-263
32. Meeusen W., and Van den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18 2 (1977) 435-444
33. Merges R.P., and Nelson R.R. On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review 90 4 (1990) 839-859
34. Meseri O., and Maital S. A Survey Analysis of university-technology transfer in Israel: Evaluation of projects and determinants of success. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 1-2 (2001) 115-126
35. Monck C.S.P., Porter R.B., Quintas P., Storey D.J., and Wynarczyk P. Science parks and the growth of high technology firms (1988), Croom Helm, London
36. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (2001) 99-119
37. Nerkar A., and Shane S. When do startups that exploit academic knowledge survive?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1391-1410
38. O'Shea, R., Allen, T., & Chevalier, A. (2004). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer, and spin-off performance of U.S. universities. Paper presented at the technology transfer society meetings, Albany, NY, October 1, 2004.
39. Roberts E. Entrepreneurs in high technology, lessons from MIT and beyond (1991), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
40. Roberts E., and Malone D.E. Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R&D Management 26 (1996) 17-48
41. Rogers E.M., Yin Y., and Hoffmann J. Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12 (2000) 47-80
42. Sena V. Stochastic frontier estimation: A review of the software options. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14 5 (1999) 579-587
43. Siegel D.S., Waldman D., and Link A.N. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy 32 1 (2003) 27-48
44. Siegel D.S., Westhead P., and Wright M. Assessing the impact of science parks on the research productivity of firms: Exploratory evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1357-1369
45. Siegel D.S., Waldman D., Atwater L., and Link A.N. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21 1-2 (2004) 115-142
46. Thursby J.G., Jensen R., and Thursby M.C. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2001) 59-72
47. Thursby J.G., and Kemp S. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy 31 1 (2002) 109-124
48. Thursby J.G., and Thursby M.C. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science 48 (2002) 90-104
49. Tushman M.L., and Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 3 (1986) 439-466
50. Westhead P. R&D 'Inputs' and 'Outputs' of technology-based firms located on and off science parks. R&D Management 27 (1997) 45-62
51. Westhead P., and Cowling M. Employment change in independent owner-managed high-technology firms in Great Britain. Small Business Economics 7 (1995) 111-140
52. Westhead P., and Storey D.J. An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom (1994), HMSO, London
53. Westhead P., and Storey D.J. Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 23 (1995) 345-360
54. Westhead P., Storey D.J., and Cowling M. An exploratory analysis of the factors associated with the survival of independent high-technology firms in Great Britain. In: Chittenden F., Robertson M., and Marshall I. (Eds). Small firms: Partnerships for growth (1995), Paul Chapman, London 63-99
55. Wright M., Lockett A., Tiratsoo N., Alferoff C., and Mosey S. Academic entrepreneurship, knowledge gaps and the role of business schools (2004), University of Nottingham, Mimeo
56. Zucker L.G., and Darby M.R. Capturing technological opportunity via Japan's star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms' biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 1-2 (2001) 37-58
57. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Armstrong J. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry 36 1 (1998) 65-86
58. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Armstrong J. University science, venture capital, and the performance of U.S. biotechnology firms (2000), UCLA, Mimeo
59. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Brewer M.B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88 1 (1998) 290-306