Multi-scale analysis of collaborative national forest planning contexts in the rural US Mountain West

Population and Environment

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 397-426

  Crawford, Thomas W ^a   Wilson, Randall K ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GETTYSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based collaboration; National forest planning; Rural transformation

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33644529118     PISSN: 01990039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11111-005-0003-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baker M., & Kusel J. (2000). Community Forestry in the United States: Learning from the Past, Crafting the Future. Washington, DC: Island Press
2. Beale C. L., & Johnson K. M. (1998). The identification of recreational counties in non-metropolitan areas of the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 37-53
3. Beyers W. B., & Nelson P. B. (2000). Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan west: New insights from rapidly growing communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 459-474
4. Booth D. E. (2002). Searching for Paradise: Economic Development and Environmental Change in the Mountain. Lanham MD: West Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
5. Brick P., Snow D., & Van de Wetering S. Eds. (2002). Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation in the American West. Washington DC: Island Press
6. Butler M. A., & Beale C., (1994). Rural-urban Continuum Codes for Metro and Nonmetro Counties, 1993. Staff Report no. 9425. Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
7. Cheng A. S., Kruger L. E., & Daniels S. E. (2003). "Place" as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 87-104
8. Conley A., & Moote M. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 371-386
9. Connick S., & Innes J. (2003). Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46, 177-197
10. Cook P. (1994). The Revised ERS County Typology: An Overview. Research Report no. 89. Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
11. Crawford T. W. (forthcoming, 2005). Polygon-to-polygon spatial accessibility using different aggregation approaches: A case study of national forests in the US Mountain West region. Transactions in GIS
12. Daniels S., & Walker G. (1996). Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 71-102
13. Dombeck M., Wood C., & Williams J. (2003). From Conquest to Conservation: Our Public Lands Legacy. Washington, DC: Island Press
14. Hansen A. J., Rasker R., Maxwell B., Rotella J. J., Johnson J. D., Parmenter A. W., Langner U., Cohen W. B., Lawrence R. L., & Kraska M. P. V. (2002). Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience, 52, 151-162
15. Hartigan J. A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley
16. Hibbard M., & Madsen J. (2003). Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the U.S. West. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 703-718
17. Honadle G. (1999). How Context Matters: Linking Environmental Policy to People and Place. Kumarian Press
18. Kenny D. (1999). Are community-based watershed groups really effective? Chronicle of Community, 3, 33-37
19. Lorah P.A., & Southwick R. (2003). Environmental protection, population change, and economic development in the rural western United States. Population and Environment, 24, 255
20. Mardia K. V., J. T. Kent, & Bibby J. M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press
21. Mathsoft. (1999). S-Plus 2000 Guide to Statistics, Volume 2. Data Analysis Products Division, Mathsoft, Seattle, WA
22. McGranahan D. (1999). Natural amenities drive rural population change. Agricultural Economic Report No. 781 Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
23. Moote A., Conley A., & Firehock K. (2000). Assessing Research Needs: Summary of a Workshop on Community-based Collaboratives. Tuscon, AZ: Udall Center Publications, University of Arizona, Publication 00-5
24. Nelson P. B. (2001). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family, and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 395-407
25. Nelson P. B. (2002). Perceptions of restructuring in the Rural West: Insights from the "cultural turn". Society and Natural Resources, 15, 903-921
26. Otterstrom S. M., & Shumway J. M. (2003). Deserts and oases: The continuing concentration of population in the American Mountain West. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 445-462
27. Overdevest C. (2000). Participatory democracy, representative democracy, and the nature of diffuse and concentrated interests: A case study of public involvement on a national forest district. Society and Natural Resources, 13, 685-696
28. Rasker R. (1994). A new looks at old vistas: The economic role of environmental quality in western public lands. University of Colorado Law Review, 2, 369-399
29. Richard T., & Burns S. (1998). Beyond 'scoping': Citizens and San Juan National Forest managers learning together. Journal of Forestry, April, 39-43
30. Riebsame W. E., Ed. (1997). Atlas of the New West: Portrait of a Changing Region. New York: W.M. Norton and Company
31. Selin S., Schuett M., & Carr D. (1997). Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests? Journal of Forestry, 96, 25-28
32. Shumway J. M., & Otterstrom S. M. (2001). Spatial patterns of migration and income change in the Mountain West: The dominance of service-based, amenity rich counties. Professional Geographer, 53, 492-502
33. Smith M., & Krannich R. (2000). 'Culture clash' revisited: Newcomer and longer- term residents' attitudes towards land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology, 65, 396-421
34. Steelman T. (2001). Elite and participatory policymaking: Finding balance in a case of national forest planning. Policy Studies Journal, 29, 71-89
35. Vaske J. J., Donnelly M. P., Williams D. R., & Jonker S. (2001). Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 761-766
36. Vogelmann J. E., Howard S. M., Yang L., Larson C. R., Wylie B. K., & Van Driel J. N. (2001). Completion of the 1990's National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 650-662
37. Wilson R. K. (2000). Public Lands, Community, and the Politics of Place: Exploring Collaborative Resource Management in Southern Colorado. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Iowa
38. Wilson R. K. (2003). Community-based management and national forests in the western United States: Five challenges. Policy Matters, 12, 216-224
39. Wilson R. K. (forthcoming). Collaboration in context: Rural change and community forestry in the Four Corners. Society and Natural Resources.
40. Wondolleck J., & Yaffee S. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press