A study of internet delays for robot teleoperation using biologically inspired approaches

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 186-194

  Liu, P X ^a   Meng, M Q H ^b   Gu, J J ^c   Yang, S X ^d  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biologically inspired; Delay; Internet; Robot; Teleoperation

Indexed keywords

DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; HAPTIC INTERFACES; INTERNET; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; REMOTE CONTROL; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; WEB BROWSERS;

BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED APPROACH; INTERNET TRANSMISSION DELAYS; ROBOT TELEOPERATION;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 3342994316     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. K. Goldberg, M. Mascha, S. Gentner, N. Rothenberg. C. Sutter, & J. Wiegley. Desktop teleoperation via the World Wide Web, Proc. of the IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya. Japan. 1995, 654-659.
2. K. Taylor & B. Dalton. Issues in Internet telerobotics, Proc. of the International Conf. on Field and Service Robotics (FSR '91), Canberra. Australia, 1997, 151-157.
3. T.A. Hudson, J.A. Bragg, & S.P. Deweerth, Biological motor control, IEEE Potentias, December 1999, 36-39.
4. T. Huntsberger, Biologically inspired autonomous rover control. Autonomous Robots, 9(11), 2001, 341-346.
5. S.X. Yang & M. Meng. Neural network approaches to dynamic collision-free trajectory generation, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man. and Cybernetics, Part B, 31(3), 2001, 302-318.
6. P. Dario, C. Laschi, M.C. Carrozza, E. Guglielmelli, G. Teli, B. Massa, M. Zecca, D. Taddeucci, & F. Leoni, An integrated approach for the design and development of a grasping and manipulation system in humanoid robotics, Proc. of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conf. on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, Takamatsu, Japan, 2000, 1-7.
7. B. Hannaford, L. Wood, D. McAffee, & H. Zak, Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(3) 1991, 620-633.
8. M.J. Massimino, Sensory substitution for force feedback in space teleoperation, doctorial diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
9. R.J. Anderson & M.W. Spong, Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34(5), 1989, 494-501.
10. G. Hirzinger, B. Brunner, J. Dietrich, & J. Heindl, Sensor-based space robotics - ROTEX and its telerobotic features, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9(5), 1993, 649-663.
11. S.S. Stevens, Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1959, 201-209.
12. L.E. Marks, R. Szczesiul, & P. Ohlott, On the cross-modal perception of intensity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 1986, 517-534.
13. M.J. Massimino, Improved force perception through sensory substitution, Control Engineering Practice, 5(2), 1995, 215-222.
14. A. Bejczy, Experimental results with a six degree of freedom force-reflect ing hand controller, Proc. of the 17th Annual Conf. on Manual Control, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 1981, 465-477.
15. H. Baier, M. Buss, F. Freyberger, J. Hoogen, P. Kammermeier, & G. Schmidt, Distributed PC-based haptic, visual and acoustic telepresence system-experiments in virtual and remote environments, Proc. of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symp., 1999, 118-125.
16. J. Postel, RFC 793: Transmission control protocol, September 1981.
17. J. Postel, RFC 768: User datagram protocol, August 1980.
18. S. Floyd, RFC 2914: Congestion control principles, September 2000.
19. S. Jin, L. Guo, I. Matta, & A. Bestavros, TCP-friendly SIMD congestion control and its convergence behaviour, Proc. of the 9th IEEE International Conf. on Network Protocols, Riverside, CA, 2001.
20. D. Sisalem & H. Schulzrinne, The loss-delay adjustment algorithm: A TCP-friendly adaptation scheme, Proc. of the International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), Cambridge, England, 1998, 215-226.
21. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, & J. Kurose, Modeling TCP throughput: A simple model and its empirical validation, Proc. of the SIGCOMM '98, Vancouver, Canada, 1998, 303-314.
22. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, & J. Widmer, Equationbased congestion control for unicast applications, Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM, 2000, 43-54.
23. S. Floyd & K. Fall, Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(4), 1999, 458-472.
24. D. Bansal & H. Balakrishnan, Binomial congestion control algorithms, Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, 2001, 631-640.
25. R. Rejaie, M. Handley, & D. Estrin, RAP: An end-toend rate-based congestion control mechanism for real-time streams in the Internet, Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, 1999, 1337-1345.
26. P.X. Liu, M. Meng, X. Ye, & J. Gu, A novel data transport protocol for Internet robots, Proc. of the 4th IEEE World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA '02), Shanghai, China, 2002, 59-65.
27. The Network Simulator - ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
28. W.R. Ferrell, Remote manipulation with transmission delay, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 6(1), 1965, 24-32.
29. S. Hayati & S. Venkataraman, Design and implementation of a robot control system with traded and shared control capability, Proc. of the 1989 IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, 1989, 1310-1315.
30. T.B. Sheridan, Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control (Cambridge, MA; London, England: The MIT Press, 1992).
31. W.B. Rouse, Human-computer interaction in the control of dynamic system, Computer Surveys, 13(1), 1981, 71-99.
32. R. Hess & B. McNally, Automation effects in a multiloop manual control system, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 16(1), 1986, 111-121.