Autobiography and the paradox of change: (Dis)locating ourselves in the process

Research in Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 57-73

  Lee, Stuart ^a   Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342895164     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461653     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Barton, A. C. (1998). Refraining "science for all" through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525-541.
4. Barton, A. C., & Roth, W.M. (1999). On agency, in science education. Submitted.
5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1982). Leçon sur la leçon. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
7. (Translated in 1990 as part of In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.)
8. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4-12.
10. Brown, J. S., Collins A., & Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11. + (20-120 keV). Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 173, 357-362.
12. Derrida, J. (1985). The ear of the other. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Derrida, J. (1998). Monolingualism of the other; or. The prosthesis of origin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Eckert, P. (1990). Adolescent social categories -information and science learning. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 203-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Eisenhart, M., & Finkel, E. (1998) Women's science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Fourez, G. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy as a social practice. Social Studies of Science, 27, 903-936.
17. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.
18. Giroux, H. (1994). Cultural studies. Harvard Educational Review. 64, 278-308.
19. Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
20. Lave, J. (1990). Views of the Classroom: Implications for math and science learning research. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 251-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Lee, S. H., & Roth, W.-M. (1999) Learning science in the community. In Science as/for sociopolitical action. Forthcoming.
23. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
24. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
25. Redfield, P. (1996). Beneath a modern sky: Space technology and its place on the ground. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21,251-274.
26. Ricceur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
27. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
28. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.) (in preparation). Science education as/for sociopolitical action.
29. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. H. (1999). Breaking the spell: Science education for a free society. In W.-M. Roth, & J. Désautels (Eds.), ). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. In preparation.
30. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Deinstitutionalising school science: Implications of a strong view of situated cognition. Research in Science Education, 27, 497-513.
31. Roth, W.-M., ,& McGinn, M. K. (1998). >unDELETE science education: /lives/work/voices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 399-421.
32. Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
33. Star, S. L. (1991a). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26-56). London, England: Routledge.
34. Star, S. L. (1991b). The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organisation and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 265-283). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
35. Tobin, K. (1999). Reproduction of social class in the teaching and learning of science in urban high schools. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, Mass.
36. Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Smith, M. (1999). Educating science teachers for the socioculturel diversity of urban schools. Research in Science Education, 29(1), 69-88.