Teacher learning instrument: A metacognitive tool for improving literacy teaching

Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 351-371

  Rosemary, Catherine A ^a  

^a JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33344478437     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613301     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Dar-ling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bear, D., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2000). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
4. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Berk, L., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
7. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520-525.
8. Crockett, M. D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers' work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 609-624.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Klein, S. P. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Dole, K. (2004). The changing role of the reading specialist in school reform. The Reading Teacher, 57, 462-471.
11. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Beasley, K. (1997). Mentoring as assisted performance: A case of coplanning. In. V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings (pp. 108-126). Washington, DC: Falmer.
12. Ferguson, R. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-498.
13. Fla veil, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Forrest-Pressley, D. L., MacKinnon, G. E., & Waller, T. G. (Eds.). (1985). Metacognition, cognition and human performance: Vol. 1. Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Academic Press.
15. Freppon, P., & Willis, J. F. (2002, December). Efficacy of the teacher learning instrument. Paper presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
16. Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Changing teachingtakes more thana one-shotwork-shop. Educational Leadership, 49, 69-72.
17. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
19. International Reading Association. (2004). Standards for readingprofessionals. Newark, DE: Author.
20. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
21. Kinnucan-Welsch, K., Zimmerman, B., & Campbell, L. (2002, December). What literacy coaches and teachers learned about the teaching-learning process through self-examination of practice. Paper presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
22. Kucan, L. (2001). Transcript analysis project (TAP): An opportunity for student teachers to engage in practical inquiry into classroom discussions. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 50, 346-355.
23. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B.(1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 201-212.
24. Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 185-192.
25. Mariage, T. V., & Garmon, M. A. (2003). A case for educational change: Improving student achievement through a school-university partnership. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 215-234.
26. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 004754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
28. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
29. Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-10.
30. Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rosemary, C. A., Freppon, P., Kinnucan-Welsch, K., Grogan, P., Feist-Willis, J., & Zimmerman, B. (2003, April). Honing the teaching of reading through structured collaborative inquiry. Presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
32. Rosemary, C. A., Freppon, P., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. with Grogan, P., Feist-Willis, J., Zimmerman, B., Campbell, L., Cobb, J., Hill, M., Walker, B., Ward, M. (2002). Improving literacy teaching through structured collaborative inquiry in classroom and university clinical settings. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 51, 368-382.
33. Rosemary, C. A., & Grogan, P. (2002, December). Relationship between teachers' learningand students' learning in teachers' self-examination of practice. Paper presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
34. Rosemary, C. A., & Roskos, K. A. (2001). Teacher learninginstrument. Unpublished manuscript, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH.
35. Roskos, K., Boehlen, S., & Walker, B. J. (2000). Learning the art of instructional conversation: The influence of self-assessment on teachers' instructional discourse in a reading clinic. Elementary School Journal, 100, 229-252.
36. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
37. Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Sykes, G. (1999). Teacher and student learning: Strengthening the connection. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousingminds to life: Teaching, learning, and schoolinginsocial context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.