Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three- dimensional MR angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 345-348

  Kopka, Lars ^a   Vosshenrich, Rolf ^a   Rodenwaldt, Jens ^a   Grabbe, Eckhardt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; BREATH HOLDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0031881578     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456943     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Prince MJ, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792
2. Shetty AN, Shirkhoda A, Bis KG, Alcantara A. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold: a novel technique. AJR 1995;165:1290-1292
3. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR 1996;166:971-981
4. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath-hold. Radiology 1996;198:725-732
5. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Dehatin JF. Brealh-hold, contrast-enhanced, three dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;201:569-571
6. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Mueller D, Fischer U, Rodenwaldt J, Grabhe E. Results of a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold after optimization of the contrast material bolus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1997;166:15-20
7. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996;201:705-710
8. Mezrich R. Perspective on k-space. Radiology 1995;195:297-315
9. Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results. Radiology 1995;195:282-284
10. Silverman PM, Brown B, Wray H, et al. Optimal enhancement of the liver using helical (spiral) CT: value of SmartPrep. AJR 1995;164:1169-1171
11. Foo TKF, Manojkumar S, Prince MR, Chenevert TL, MR SmartPrep: an automated method for detecting the bolus arrival time and initiating data acquisition in fast 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 1996. Berkeley, CA: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1996:453
12. Burgener FA, Hamlin D. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT. AJR 1981;137:351-358
13. Hendrick RE, Haacke EM. Basic physics of MR contrast agents and maximization of image contrast, J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:137-148
14. Strouse PJ, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Effect of the rate of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration on abdominal vascular and soft-tissue MR imaging enhancement patterns. Radiology 1996;201:809-816
15. Mitchell DG, Stolpen AH, Siegelrnan ES, Bolinger L, Outwater EK. Fatty tissue on opposed-phased MR images: paradoxical suppression of signal intensity by paramagnetic contrast agents, Radiology 1996;198:351-357
16. Lauzon ML, Holdsworth DW, Frayne R, Rutt BK. Effects of physiologic waveform variability in triggered MR imaging: theoretical analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:853-867
17. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-651