Charge carrier correlation in the electron-doped t-J model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2006, Pages

  Leung, P W ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144484071     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.075104     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 66, 763 (1994).
2. T. Tohyama and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.3596 49, 3596 (1994).
3. R. J. Gooding, K. J. E. Vos, and P. W. Leung, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.12866 50, 12866 (1994).
4. N. P. Armitage, F. Ronning, D. H. Lu, C. Kim, A. Damascelli, K. M. Shen, D. L. Feng, H. Eisaki, Z.-X. Shen, P. K. Mang, N. Kaneko, M. Greven, Y. Onose, Y. Taguchi, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257001 88, 257001 (2002).
5. A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.473 75, 473 (2003).
6. T. Tohyama and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.212505 64, 212505 (2001).
7. T. Tohyama and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.92509 67, 92509 (2003).
8. T. Tohyama, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.174517 70, 174517 (2004).
9. Q. Yuan, Y. Chen, T. K. Lee, and C. S. Ting, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.214523 69, 214523 (2004).
10. Q. Yuan, T. K. Lee, and C. S. Ting, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134522 71, 134522 (2005).
11. We remark that there is another approach to the electron-doped model which, in contrast to the strong-coupling limit assumed in the t-J model, emphasizes the importance of intermediate coupling. See, for example, D. Sénéchal and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126401 92, 126401 (2004), and references therein.
12. P. W. Leung and R. J. Gooding, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.R15711 52, R15711 (1995).
13. A. L. Chernyshev, P. W. Leung, and R. J. Gooding, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.13594 58, 13594 (1998).
14. P. W. Leung, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.205101 65, 205101 (2002).
15. P. W. Leung, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.14502 73, 14502 (2006).
16. P. W. Leung and K. K. Ng, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B IJPBEV 0217-9792 17, 3367 (2003).
17. P. W. Leung, B. O. Wells, and R. J. Gooding, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.6320 56, 6320 (1997).
18. It has been suggested that in the electron-doped model not only the signs and the magnitudes of the hopping terms are different from those in the hole-doped model [see H. Eskes and G. A. Sawatzky, Physica C PHYCE6 0921-4534 10.1016/0921-4534(89)90415-2 160, 424 (1989)]. But since we are not interested in the detail quantitative differences, we only change the signs of the hopping terms in the electron-doped model.
19. V. I. Belinicher, A. L. Chernyshev, and V. A. Shubin, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.335 53, 335 (1996).
20. J. A. Riera and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9697 39, R 9697 (1989).
21. R. Eder and P. Wróbel, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.6010 47, 6010 (1993).
22. R. Eder, Y. Ohta, and T. Shimozato, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.3350 50, 3350 (1994).
23. W. Stephan and P. Horsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2258 66, 2258 (1990).
24. R. Eder and Y. Ohta, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.51. 6041 51, 6041 (1995).
25. P. Fulde, Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
26. E. Manousakis, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1 63, 1 (1991).
27. D. A. Ivanov, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3958 84, 3958 (2000).
28. P. W. Leung, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R6112 62, R6112 (2000).
29. We remark that there is another independent interpretation of the same result in the spin-polaron picture. See P. Wróbel and R. Eder, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.184504 64, 184504 (2001).
30. T. C. Ribeiro and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.24501 68, 24501 (2003).