Partial least square projections to latent structures analysis (PLS) in evaluating and predicting drug release from starch acetate matrix tablets

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 94, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2716-2730

  Korhonen, Ossi ^a   Matero, Sanni ^a   Poso, Antti ^a   Ketolainen, Jarkko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Extended release; PLS; Starch acetate; Tablets; VolSurf parameters

Indexed keywords

ATENOLOL; DICLOFENAC; DILTIAZEM; IBUPROFEN; PROPRANOLOL; STARCH; STARCH ACETATE; THEOPHYLLINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; EVALUATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE PROJECTIONS TO LATENT STRUCTURES ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TABLET; TABLET FORMULATION; TABLET MANUFACTURE;

EID: 33144471121     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: 15206017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20485     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Korhonen O, Raatikainen P, Harjunen P, Nakari J, Suihko E, Peltonen S, Vidgren M, Paronen P. 2000. Starch acetates-multifunctional direct compression excipients. Pharm Res 17:1138-1143.
2. Korhonen O, Pohja S, Peltonen S, Suihko E, Vidgren M, Paronen P, Ketolainen J. 2002. Effects of physical properties for starch acetate powders on tableting. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 3(4):1-9.
3. Raatikainen P, Korhonen O, Peltonen S, Paronen P. 2002. Acetylation enhances the tabletting properties of starch. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 28:165-175.
4. Pohja S, Suihko E, Vidgren M, Paronen P, Ketolainen J. 2004. Starch acetate as a matrix for sustained release. J Control Rel 94:293-302.
5. van Veen B, Pajander J, Zuurman K, Lappalainen R, Poso A, Frijlink HW, Ketolainen J. 2005. The effect of powder blend and tablet structure on drug release mechanisms of hydrophobic starch acetate matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, in press.
6. Tzafriri AR. 2000. Mathematical modeling of diffusion-mediated release from bulk degrading matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:69-79.
7. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. 2001. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 48:139-157.
8. Siepmman J, Gopferich A. 2001. Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 48:229-247.
9. Kost J, Langer R. 2001. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:125-148.
10. Noyes AS, Whitney WR. 1897. The rate of solution of solid substances in their own solutions. J Amer Chem Soc 19:930-934.
11. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Buri P, Peppas NA. 1983. Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15: 25-35.
12. Ritger PL, Peppas NA. 1987. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from nonswellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres cylinders or discs. J Control Rel 5:23-36.
13. Sathe PM, Tsong Y, Shah VP. 1996. In-vitro dissolution profile comparison: Statistic and analysis, model dependent approach. Pharm Res 13: 1799-1803.
14. Dressman JB, Amidon GL, Reppas GL, Shah VP. 1998. Dissolution testing as a prognostic tool for oral drug absorption: Immediate release dosage form. Pharm Res 15:11-22.
15. Pillay V, Fassihi R. 1998. Evaluation and comparison of dissolution data derived from different modified release dosage forms: An alternative method. J Control Rel 55:45-55.
16. Costa P, Lobo JMS. 2001. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci 13:123-133.
17. Kosmidis K, Argyrakis P, Macheras P. 2003. A reappraisal of drug release laws using Monte Carlo simulations: The prevalence of the Weibull function. Pharm Res 20:988-998.
18. Lánský P, Weiss M. 2003. Classification of dissolution profiles in terms of fractional dissolution rate and a novel measure of heterogeneity. J Pharm Sci 92:1632-1647.
19. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S. 2001. Multi- and megavariate data analysis: Principles and applications, Umeå, Sweden: Umetrics Academy.
20. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 2:37-52.
21. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ, III. 1984. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J Sci Statist Comput 5:735-743.
22. Cruciani G, Pastor M, Gupa W. 2001. VolSurf: A new tool for pharmacokinetic optimization of lead compounds. Eur J Pharm Sci 11:S29-S39.
23. http://www.moldiscovery.com/docs/volsurf/index. html.
24. Heckel RW. 1961a. Density pressure relationship in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME 221: 671-675.
25. Heckel RW. 1961b. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME 221: 1001-1008.
26. De Blaey CJ, Polderman J. 1970. Compression of pharmaceutical: I. The quantitative interpretation of force displacement curves. Pharm Weekbl 105: 241-250.
27. De Blaey CJ, Polderman J. 1971. Compression of pharmaceutical: II. Registration and determination of force-diaplacement curves, using a small digital computer. Pharm Weekbl 106:57-65
28. Ragnarsson G, Sjögren J. 1983. Work of friction and net work during compaction. J Pharm Pharmacol 35:201-204.
29. Ragnarsson G, Sjögren J. 1985. Force displacement measurement in tableting. J Pharm Pharmacol 37: 145-150.
30. Takeuchi H, Nagira S, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. 2004. Die wall pressure measurement for evaluation of compaction property of pharmaceutical materials. Int J Pharm 274:131-138.
31. Wang J, Li T, Bateman S, Erck R, Morris K. 2003. Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression: I. Atomic force microscopy and molecular simulation. J Pharm Sci 92:798-814.
32. Wang J, Guillot M, Bateman S, Erck R, Morris K. 2004. Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression: II. Compaction studies using a compaction simulator and an instrumented tablet press. J Pharm Sci 93:407-417.
33. van der Voort Maarschalk K, Zoorman K, Vromans H, Bolhuis G, Lerk C. 1996. Porosity expansion of tablets as a result of bonding and deformation of particulate solids. Int J Pharm 140:185-193.
34. Suihko E, Forbes RT, Korhonen O, Ketolainen J, Paronen P, Gynther J, Poso A. 2005. Prediction of contact angle for pharmaceutical solids from their molecular structure. J Pharm Sci 94:745-758.