Tunable fluorene-based dynamers through constitutional dynamic chemistry

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1723-1735

  Giuseppone, Nicolas ^a,b   Fuks, Gad ^a,b   Lehn, Jean Marie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

^b l'alimentation et l'Environnement   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic combinatorial chemistry; Molecular diversity; Polymers; Stimuli responsive systems; Tunable functional materials

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; FLUORESCENCE; IONS; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; ZINC;

DYNAMIC COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DIVERSITY; STIMULI-RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS;

OLIGOMERS;

EID: 32944474355     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200501037     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. a) J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4763;
2. b) J.-M. Lehn, Science 2002, 295, 2400.
3. S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders, J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 938;
4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
5. a) J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455;
6. b) A. V. Eliseev, J.-M. Lehn, Combin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 243, 159;
7. c) O. Ramström, J.-M. Lehn, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 26.
8. a) R. L. Cousins, S. A. Poulsen, J. K. M. Sanders, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 270;
9. b) R. S. Otto, R. L. E. Furlan, J.K. M. Sanders, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 321;
10. c) B. Klekota, B. L. Miller, TIBTECH 1999, 17, 205;
11. d) V. Wittmann, Nachr. Chem. 2002, 50, 724.
12. For dynamic materials, see: a) J.-M. Lehn in Supramolecular Science: Where It Is and Where It Is Going (Eds.: R. Ungaro, E. Dalcanale), Kluwer, Dordrecht (The Netherlands), 1999, p. 287;
13. b) Polyacylhydrazones: W. G. Skene, J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8270.
14. a) Supramolecular Polymers, 2nd ed. (Ed.: A. Ciferri), Taylor Francis, New York, 2004;
15. b) J.-M. Lehn in Supramolecular Polymers, 2nd ed. (Ed.: A. Ciferri), Taylor Francis, New York, 2004, Chapter 1, p. 3;
16. c) J.-M. Lehn, Polym. Int. 2002, 51, 825.
17. B. Hasenknopf, J.-M. Lehn, B. O. Kneisel, G. Baum, D. Fenske, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1987;
18. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1838.
19. a) J. Nitschke, J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11 970;
20. b) N. Giuseppone, J.-L. Schmitt, J.-M. Lehn, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 5010;
21. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4902;
22. c) O. Storm, U. Lüning, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 793;
23. d) K. Severin, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 2565;
24. e) D. Schultz, J. R. Nitschke, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11 191.
25. N. Giuseppone, J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1715 (preceding paper).
26. N. Giuseppone, J.-M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11 448.
27. For recent reviews on polyfluorenes, see: a) M. Leclerc, J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2001, 39, 2867;
28. b) U. Scherf, S. Riechel, U. Lemmer, R. F. Mahrt, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2001, 5, 143;
29. c) U. Scherf, E. J. W. List, Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 477.
30. a) J. H. Burroughes, D. D. C. Bradley, A. R. Brown, R. N. Marks, K. Mackay, R. H. Friend, P. L. Burn, A. B. Holmes, Nature 1990, 347, 539;
31. b) Y. Ohmori, A. Uchida, K. Muro, K. Yoshino, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 1991, 30, L1941;
32. c) Pei, Q.; Yang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7416;
33. d) D. Neher, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 1365;
34. e) S. Becker, C. Ego, A. C. Grimsdale, E. J. W. List, D. Marsitzky, A. Pogantsch, S. Setayesh, G. Leising, K. Müllen, Synth. Met. 2002, 125, 73;
35. f) for solution-phase electroluminescence, see: J. B. Edel, A. J. deMello, J. C. deMello, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1954.
36. a) M. Ranger, M. Leclerc, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 3306;
37. b) P. Blondin, J. Bouchard, S. Beaupré, M. Belletête, G. Durocher, M. Leclerc, Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5874.
38. J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry - Concepts and Perspectives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, Chapters 9 and 10.
39. During the course of our studies, polymers related to polyiminofluorenes were described, as good candidates for optoelectronic devices, but they were not used for dynamic chemistry, see: K. Hyun-Chul, K. Jong-Seong, K. Kie-Soo, P. Honk-Ki, B. Sungsik, R. Moonhor, J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2004, 42, 825.
40. 2D increases, the rate of the equilibration process is faster than the time necessary for running a proton NMR experiment; these kinetic aspects (b and c are discussed below.
41. + concentration and temperature. The use of an equimolar ratio is nevertheless important for further polymerization reactions.
42. -1 M (85%) and for values above 1 M.
43. 2D] = 0 M, the conversion is not affected but the selectivity is a somewhat lower compared to the 298 K experiment.
44. K. Yamamoto, M. Higuchi, S. Shlki, M. Tsuruta, H. Chiba, Nature 2002, 415, 509.
45. Qing T. Zhang, James M. Tour, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9624.
46. 3, etc.).
47. -4 M.
48. II with hexamethylhexacyclene B in water is 13.29. See, "Cryptands": B. Dietrich, Compr. Supramol. Chem. 1996, 1, 153.
49. N. Giuseppone, J.-L. Schmitt, E. Schwartz, J.-M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5528.
50. Y. Jin, J. Ju, J. Kim, S. Lee, J. Y. Kim, S. H. Park, S.-M. Son, S.-H. Jin, K. Lee, H. Suh, Macromolecules 2003, 36, 6970-6975.