Effectiveness of feedback during the testing of preschool children, elementary school children, and adolescents with developmental delays

Psychological Record

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-195

  Epstein, Michael L ^a   Brosvic, Gary M ^a   Costner, Kate L ^a   Dihoff, Roberta E ^c   Lazarus, Amber D ^b  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038457614     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395439     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AIKEN, E. G. (1968). Delayed feedback effects on learning and retention of Morse Code symbols. Psychological Reports, 23, 723-730.
2. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. BAECHLE, C. L., & LIAN, M. G. (1990). The effects of direct feedback and practice on metaphor performance in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 451-455.
4. BEESON, R. O. (1973). Immediate knowledge of results and test performance. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 224-226.
5. BOISVERT, M., STANDING, L., & MOLLER, L. (1999). Successful whole-part perception in young children using multiple-choice tests. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160, 167-180.
6. BRACKBILL, Y., BRAVOS, A., & STARR, R. H. (1962). Delay-improved retention of a difficult task. Physiological Psychology, 55, 947-952.
7. BROSVIC, G. M., WALKER, M. A., PERRY, N., & DEGNAN, S. (1997). Illusion decrement as a function of duration of inspection and figure type. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 84, 779-783.
8. CLARK, J. W., FOX, P. A., & SCHNEIDER, H. G. (1998). Feedback, text anxiety, and performance in a college course. Psychological Reports, 82, 203-208.
9. EPSTEIN, M. L., EPSTEIN, B. B., & BROSVIC, G. M. (2001). Immediate feedback during academic testing. Psychological Reports, 88, 889-894.
10. EPSTEIN, M. L., LAZARUS, A. D., CALVANO, T. B., MATTHEWS, K. A., HENDEL, R. A., EPSTEIN, B. B., & BROSVIC, G. M. (2002). Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52, 187-201.
11. ERICKSON, M. T., & LIPSITT, L. P. (1960). Effects of delayed reward on simultaneous and successive discrimination learning in children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53, 256-260.
12. FARMER, M. E., KLEIN, R., & BRYSON, S. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 13, 50-60.
13. GAYNOR, P. (1981). The effect of feedback delay on retention of computer-based mathematical material. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 8, 28-34.
14. HETHERINGTON, E. M., & ROSS, L. E. (1967). Discrimination learning by normal and retarded children under delay of reward and interpolated task conditions. Child Development, 38, 639-647.
15. HETHERINGTON, E. M., ROSS, L. E., & PICK, N. L. (1964). Delay of reward and learning in mentally retarded and normal children. Child Development, 35, 653-659.
16. HRESKO, W. P., MIGUEL, S. A., SHERBENOU, R. J., & BURTON, S. D. (1994). Developmental Observation Checklist System: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: ProEd Corporation.
17. HUEBUSCH, J. D., & LLOYD, J. W. (1998). Corrective feedback and oral learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 81, 63-79.
18. KEARNEY, C. A., & DRABMAN, R. S. (1993). The write-say method for improving spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 52-56.
19. KLUGER, A., & DENISI, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67-72.
20. KULHAVY, R. W., & ANDERSON, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 505-512.
21. LEVORATO, M. C., & CACCAIARI, C. (1999). Idiom expression in children: Are the effects of semantic analyzability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51-66.
22. LOBB, N. (1998). Steps to independent living series: How to get well when you're sick or hurt. Portland, ME: J. Weston Walch Publishers.
23. LUNDGREN, D. C., SAMPSON, E. B., & CAHOON, M. B. (1998). Undergraduate men's and women's responses to positive and negative feedback about academic performance. Psychological Reports, 82, 87-93.
24. MCDONNELL, J., THORSON, N., ALLEN, C., & MATHOT-BRUCKNER, C. (2000). The effects of partner learning during spelling for students with severe disabilities and their peers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 107-121.
25. MECHLING, L. C., & GAST, D. L. (1997). Combination audio/visual self-prompting system for teaching chained tasks to students with intellectual disabilities. Education & Training in Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 32, 138-153.
26. MORRIS, R. J. (1994). Behavior modification with exceptional children: Principles and practice. Chicago, IL: Scott, Foresman Company.
27. MY DRUC TRAM, J., & VARNHAGEN, C. K. (1998). Questions in a research setting. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 44, 408-415.
28. OKOLO, C. M. (1992). The effects of computer-based attribution retraining on the attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 324-334.
29. PANY, D., & MCCOY, K. M. (1988). Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 546-550.
30. PARIS, S. G., & LINDAUER, B. K. (1976). The role of interference in children's comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 217-227.
31. PERKINS, V. L. (1988). Feedback effects on oral reading errors of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 244-248.
32. PETERSON, C., & GRANT, M. (2001). Forced-choice: Are forensic interviewers asking the right questions? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 118-127.
33. PEVERLY, S. T., & WOOD, R. (2001). The effects of adjunct questions and feedback on improving the reading comprehension skills of learning-disabled adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 25-43.
34. PHYE, G. D., & BENDER, T. (1989). Feedback complexity and practice: Response-pattern analysis in retention and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 97-110.
35. ROBINSON, S. L., DEPASCALE, C., & ROBERTS, F. C. (1989). Computer-delivered feedback in group-based instruction: Effects for learning-disabled students in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 28-35.
36. ROSS, L. E., HETHERINGTON, E. M., & WRAY, N. P. (1965). Delay of reward and the learning of a size problem by normal and retarded children. Child Development, 36, 509-517.
37. SASSEN, J. M., YONGE, G. D., & SHRABLE, K. (1968). Immediate and delayed feedback on examinations and immediate and delayed retention. California Journal of Educational Research, 19, 226-231.
38. SCHUNCK, D. H., & RICE, J. M. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 257-276.
39. SCHUSTER, J. W., MORSE, T. E., GRIFFEN, A. B., & WORLEY, T. (1996). Teaching peer reinforcement and grocery words: An investigation of observational learning and instructive feedback. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 511-533.
40. SOLOMON, P. G. (1998). The curriculum bridge: From standards to actual classroom practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41. SPARROW, S. S., BALLA, D. S., & CICCHETTI, D. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
42. STUBBLEBINE, P. C. (1998). Effect of threatening feedback on expected grade, self efficacy, and motivation. Psychological Reports, 86, 67-77.
43. SURBER, J. R., & ANDERSON, R. C. (1975). Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 170-173.
44. TURNER, L. A., & MATHERNE, J. L. (1994). The effects of performance feedback on memory strategy use and recall accuracy in students with and without mild mental retardation. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 303-309.
45. VAN HOUTEN, R., MORRISON, E., JARVIS, R., & MCDONALD, M. (1974). The effects of explicit timing and feedback on compositional response rate in elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 547-555.
46. WAGNER, D., COOK, G., & FRIEDMAN, S. (1998). Staying with their first impulse? The relationship between impulsivity/reflectivity, field dependence/field independence and answer changes on a multiple-choice exam in a fifth-grade sample. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 31, 166-175.
47. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: Author.