Providing adaptive support for meta-cognitive skills to improve learning

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-05-04, Issue , 2005, Pages 86-91

  Muldner, Kasia ^a   Conati, Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

META-COGNITIVE SKILLS; STUDENT MODEL;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 32944460135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anderson, J., and Fincham, J. 1994. Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20(6): 1322-1340.
2. Anderson, J. R.; Corbett, A. T.; Koedinger, K.; and Pelletier, R. 1995. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences 4(2): 167-207.
3. Anderson, J.; Fincham, J.; and Douglas, S. 1997. The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23(4):932-945.
4. Atkinson, R.; Derry, S.; Renkl, A.; and Wortham, D. 2000. Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research 70(2):181-214.
5. Bassok, M.; Wu, L.; and Olseth, K. 1995. Judging a book by its cover: Interpretive effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory and Cognition 23(3):354-367.
6. Bunt, A.; Conati, C.; and Muldner, K. 2004. Scaffolding self-explanation to improve learning in exploratory learning environments. In Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 656-667. Springer.
7. Chi, M., and VanLehn, K. 1992. The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(1):69-105.
8. Chi, M.; Basssok, M.; Lewis, M.; Reimann, P.; and Glaser, R. 1989. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13:145-182.
9. Chi, M.; Feltovich, P.; and Glaser, R. 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5(2): 121-152.
10. Conati, C., and VanLehn, K. 2000. Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: a computational frame-work to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11:389-415.
11. Conati, C.; Gertner, A.; VanLehn, K.; and Druzdzel, M. 1997. On-line student modeling for coached problem solving using bayesian networks. In Jameson, A.; Paris, C.; and Tasso, C., eds., Proceedings of the sixth International Conference in User Modeling, 231-242. Springer-Verlag.
12. Cooper, G., and Sweller, J. 1987. Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 79(4):347-362.
13. Mitrovic, A. 2003. Supporting self-explanation in a data normalization tutor. In Aleven, V.; Hopppe, U.; J. Kay, R. M.; Pain, H.; Verdejo, F.; and Yacef, K., eds., International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Supplementary Proceedings, 565-577.
14. Novick, L. 1988. Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14(3):510-520.
15. Novick, L. 1995. Some determinants of successful analogical transfer in the solution of algebra word problems. Thinking and Reasoning 1(1): 1-30.
16. Reed, S., and Bolstad, C. 1991. Use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17(4):753-766.
17. Reed, S.; Dempster, A.; and Ettinger, M. 1985. Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11(1):106-125.
18. Reed, S. 1987. A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 13(1): 124-139.
19. Schoenfeld, A., and Herrmann, D. 1982. Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 8(5):484-494.
20. Silver, E. 1979. Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10(3): 195-210.
21. Sweller, J., and Cooper, G. 1985. The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2(1):59-89.
22. VanLehn, K., and Jones, R. 1993. Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly. In Utgoff, P. E., ed., Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, San Mateo, CA, 338-345. Morgan Kaufmann.
23. VanLehn, K.; Jones, R.; and Chi, M. 1992. A model of the self-explanation effect. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(1): 1-59.
24. VanLehn, K. 1996. Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology 47:513-539.
25. VanLehn, K. 1998. Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving. Cognitive Science 22(3):347-388.
26. VanLehn, K. 1999. Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8(1):71-125.
27. Weber, G. 1996. Individual selection of examples in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(1):3-33.