Beyond strategies: Teacher beliefs and writing instruction in two primary inclusion classrooms

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 11-24

  Wiebe Berry, Ruth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32844467826     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194060390010301     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1979). Differences between belief and knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355-366.
2. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Graham, S. (2003). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: Research-based applications and examples. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 109-123.
3. Banicky, L. A. (2000). Opportunity to learn (Policy Brief Vol. 7). Retrieved February 16, 2003, from http://www.udel.edu/chep/edbriefs/opplearn.pdf
4. Beach, S. A. (1994). Teacher's theories and classroom practice: Beliefs, knowledge, or context? Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 15, 189-196.
5. Bos, C. S. (1988). Process-oriented writing: Instructional implications for mildly handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 521-527.
6. Boundy, K. B. (1999). Opportunity to learn and education reform: Ensuring access to effective education for all students. Retrieved September 24, 2003, from http://specialed.principals.org/discidea/topdocs/peer/opportunityib.html
7. Brantlinger, E. (1996). Influence of preservice teachers' beliefs about pupil achievement on attitudes toward inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 17-33.
8. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.
9. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
10. Cooper, D. H., & Valli, L. R. (1996). Designing classrooms for inclusion: Beyond management. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 143-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cresswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Dixon, C., & de la Cruz, E. (1992, December). Making visible the invisible: Exploring the construction of communities of writers in classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
13. Englert, C. S., Berry, R., & Dunsmore, K. (2001). A case study of the apprenticeship process: Another perspective on the apprentice and the scaffolding metaphor. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 152-171.
14. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis [electronic version]. Elementary School Journal, 301, 251-272,
15. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). Whole language and process writing: Does one approach fit all? In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kame'enui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 239-258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Fink, B. (2002). Primary grade teachers' theoretical orientations concerning writing instruction: Construct validation and a nationwide survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 147-166.
17. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177-202.
18. Gregg, N., & Mather, N. (2002). School is fun at recess: Informal analyses of written language for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 7-22.
19. Gutiérrez, K. (1994). How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education, 5, 335-365.
20. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Stone, L. D. (1997). A cultural-historical view of learning and learning disabilities: Participating in a community of learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 123-131.
21. Heath, S. B. (1983) Ways with words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Herman, J. L., & Klein, D. C. D. (December). Assessing opportunity to learn: A California example (CSE Technical Report 453). Retrieved November 15,2003, from www.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/Reports/TECH453.pdf
23. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133-170.
24. Howe, K. (2001). Qualitative educational research: The philosophical issues. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 201-208). Washington, DC: AERA.
25. Jordan, A., & Stanovich, P. (2003). Teachers' personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3, 1-14.
26. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90.
27. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Lipson, M. Y., Mosenthal, J., Daniels, P., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (2000). Process writing in the classrooms of eleven fifth-grade teachers with different orientations to teaching and learning [electronic version]. Elementary School Journal, 101, 209-231.
29. Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan's "Learning lessons" reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 239-280.
30. Mariage, T. V. (1995). Why students learn: The nature of teacher talk during reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 214-234.
31. Mariage, T. V. (2001). Features of an interactive writing discourse: Conversational involvement, conventional knowledge, and internalization in "Morning Message." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 172-196.
32. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Morocco, C. C., & Hindin, A. (2002). The role of conversation in a thematic understanding of literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 144-159.
35. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Teachers' beliefs and behaviors: What really matters? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37, 3-15.
36. Munby, H. (1987). Metaphor and teachers' knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 377-397.
37. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19,317-328.
38. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Student engagement: When recitation becomes conversation. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 257-276). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
39. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
41. Rankin-Erickson, J. L., & Pressley, M. (2000). A survey of instructional practices of special education teachers nominated as effective teachers of literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 206-225.
42. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Schwartz, W. (1995). Opportunity to learn standards: Their impact on urban students (ERIC/CUE Digest Number 110). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED389816) Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.ericfacility.net/ ericdigests/ed389816.html
44. Sexton, M., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on composition writing and attributions [electronic version]. Exceptional Children, 64, 295-312.
45. Slee, R. (1997). Inclusion or assimilation? Sociological explorations of the foundations of theories of special education. Educational foundations, 22(1), 55-71.
46. Stanovich, P. J., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers' and principals' beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 98, 221-238.
47. Stringer, S. J., Morton, R. C., & Bonikowski, M. H. (1999). Learning disabled students: Using process writing to build autonomy and self esteem [electronic version]. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 196-200.
48. Tuyay, S., Jennings, L., & Dixon, C. (1995). Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third-grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 19, 75-110.
49. Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1996). Classroom ecologies: Classroom interactions and implications for inclusion of students with learning disabilities. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 107-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Shin, H. (1995). Opportunity-to-learn standards (Policy Directions No. 4). Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Policy4.html