Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery;Peroperační monitorace somatosenzorických a motorických evokovaných potenciálů u operací skolióz

Ceska a Slovenska Neurologie a Neurochirurgie

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-51

  Němec, Martin ^a   Bednarik J ^a   Krbec, M ^a   Mokra M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRNO   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Intraoperative monitoring; Motor evoked potentials scoliosis; Somatosensory evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; PARAPLEGIA; PERONEUS NERVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RELIABILITY; REMISSION; SCOLIOSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIBIAL NERVE; TRACTION THERAPY;

EID: 32544443933     PISSN: 12107859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Owen JH. The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity. Spine 1999; 24: 2649-62.
2. Deletis V, Kothbauer K. Intraoperative neurophysiology of the corticospinal tract. In: Stalberg E, Sharma H S, Olsson Y (editors) Spinal Cord Monitoring. Wien New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998 p. 421-44.
3. Nuwer MR. The multicenter outcome survey for spinal cord monitoring: monitoring reduces neurologic deficits, In: Stalberg E, Sharma H S, Olsson Y (eds) Spinal Cord Monitoring. Wien New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 478-89.
4. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke-LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care. Spine 1998; 23: 1392-400.
5. Burke DJ, Hicks RG. Intraoperative monitoring with motor and sensory evoked potentials. In: Chiappa KH. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. 3d ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publisher; 1997. p. 675-89.
6. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedics spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002 113: 1082-91.
7. DiCindio S, Theroux M, Shah S, Miller F, Dabney K, Brislin RP, et al. Multimodality monitoring of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory-evoked potentials during surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders. Spine 2003; 28: 1851-5.
8. Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22: 1620-30.
9. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LEA, Herman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 6-11.
10. Andoh T, Okumura F. Effects of anesthetics on somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in humans. In: Stalberg E, Sharma H S, Olsson Y (editors) Spinal Cord Monitoring. Wien New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 491-508.
11. Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Ribberink AA, Patel PM, Sano T, Bickford RG. Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam and fentanyl on motor evoked response to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans. Anestesiology 1992; 76: 502-9.
12. Nathan N, Tabaraud F, Lacroix F, Moulies D, Viviand X, Lasande A, et al. Influence of propofol concentration on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 493-7.
13. Othman Z, Lenke LG, Bolon SM, Padberg A. Hypotension-induced loss of intraoperative monitoring data during surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis: a case report. Spine 2004; 29: E258-65.