Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 114-128

  Waldorp, Lourens J ^a,b   Huizenga, Hilde M ^a   Grasman, Raoul P P P ^a   Böcker, Koen B E ^c   Molenaar, Peter C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Brain imaging; Inverse problem; Linear inverse; Minimum norm; Statistical map

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HYPOTHESIS; LINEAR SYSTEM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAP;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 32544433478     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20170     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson T (1958): An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Baas J, Kenemans J, Mangun G (2002): Selective attention to spatial frequency: an ERP and source localization analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1840-1854.
3. Baillet S, Garnero L (1997): A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:374-385.
4. Barnes G, Hillebrand A (2003): Statistical flattening of MEG beam-former images. Hum Brain Mapp 18:1-12.
5. Ben-Israel A, Greville T (2003): Generalized inverses: theory and applications. New York: Springer.
6. Bénar C-G, Gunn R, Grova C, Champagne B, Gotman J (2005): Statistical maps for EEG dipolar source localization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:401-413.
7. Bilodeau M, Brenner D (1999): Theory of multivariate statistics. New York: Springer.
8. Dale A, Liu A, Fischi B, Buckner R, Belliveau J, Lewine J, Halgren E (2000): Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26:55-67.
9. Dale A, Sereno M (1993): Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 162-176.
10. De Munck J, Vijn P, da Silva FL (1992): A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity. IEEE Transon Biomed Eng 39:791-804.
11. Dogandžić A, Nehorai A (2000): Estimating dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays. IEEE Trans Signal Process 48:13-25.
12. Grasman R (2004): Sensor array signal processing and the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem in functional connectivity analysis of the brain. Ph.D. thesis. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Hauk O, Gonzalez Andino S, Vogt H, Michel C (1997): Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Hum Brain Mapp 5:454-467.
14. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino S (1998): A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:440-448.
15. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Murray M, Gonzalez Andino S (2004a): Improving the performance of linear inverse solutions by inverting the resolution matrix. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1680-1683.
16. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Murray M, Michel C, Martuzzi R, Gonzalez Andino S (2004b): Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage 21:527-539.
17. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa O (1993): Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65:413-497.
18. Hansen P (1992): Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-Curve. SIAM Rev 34:561-580.
19. Kenemans J, Baas J, Mangun G, Lijffijt M, Verbaten M (2000): On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1113-1123.
20. Kiebel S, Friston K (2004a): Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials. I. Generic considerations. Neuroimage 22: 492-502.
21. Kiebel S, Friston K (2004b): Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials. II. A hierarchical temporal model. Neuroimage 22:503-520.
22. Liu A, Dale A, Belliveau J (2002): Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum Brain Mapp 16:47-62.
23. Menke W (1989): Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. New York: Academic Press.
24. Michel C, Grave de Peralta R, Lantz G, Gonzalez Andino S, Spinelli L, Blanke O, Landis T, Seeck M (1999): Spatiotemporal EEG analysis and distributed source estimation in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. J Clin Neurophysiol 16:239-266.
25. Mosher J, Lewis P, Leahy R (1992): Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal meg data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:541-557.
26. Muirhead R (1982): Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Pascual-Marqui R, Michel C, Lehmann D (1994): Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18:49-65.
28. Phillips J, Leahy R, Mosher J (1997): MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:338-348.
29. Phillips G, Rugg M, Friston K (2002): Anatomically informed basis functions for eeg source localization: combining functional and anatomical constraints. Neuroimage 16:678-695.
30. Pringle R, Rayner A (1971): Generalized inverse matrices with applications to statistics. London: Charles Griffin and Co.
31. Srivastava M, Carter E (1983): An introduction to applied multivariate statistics. New York: Elsevier Science.
32. Van der Vaart A (1998): Asymptotic statistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Waldorp L, Huizenga H, Grasman R, Böcker B, Munck J, Molenaar P (2002): Model selection in electromagnetic source analysis with an application to VEFs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49:1121-1129.
34. Worsley K (2001): Statistical analysis of activation images. In: Jezzard, Matthews, Smith, editors. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: an introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p 251-270.
35. Xiang D, Wahba G (1996): A generalized approximate cross validation for smoothing splines with non-Gaussian data. Stat Sin 6:675-692.