Identifying entanglement using quantum ghost interference and imaging

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 23, 2004, Pages

  D'Angelo, Milena ^a   Kim, Yoon Ho ^b   Kulik, Sergei P ^a,c   Shih, Yanhua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; CORRELATION METHODS; DIFFRACTION; DISPERSIONS; LASER BEAMS; LITHOGRAPHY; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS; PHOTONS; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY; QUARTZ;

IMAGE PATTERN; MOMENTUM; QUANTUM ENTANGLED SYSTEM; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 3242713390     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.233601     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. E. Schrödinger, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, New York, 1983).
2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
3. D. N. Klyshko, Photon and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1988).
4. J. P. Dowling and G.J. Milburn, quant-ph/0206091; A. Migdall, Phys. Today 52, No. 1, 41 (1999).
5. J. P. Dowling and G.J. Milburn, quant-ph/0206091; A. Migdall, Phys. Today 52, No. 1, 41 (1999).
6. D.V. Strekalov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).
7. T. B. Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429 (1995).
8. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022309 (2002); Y. Shih (unpublished).
9. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022309 (2002); Y. Shih (unpublished).
10. A. N. Boto, P. Kok, D. S. Abrams, S. L. Braunstein, C. P. Williams, and J.P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2733 (2000).
11. M. D'Angelo, M.V. Chekhova, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett 87, 013602 (2001).
12. R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113601 (2002).
13. M. H. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, Y. H. Shih, and A.V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 50, 5122 (1994).
14. A similar nonclassicality relation has been verified experimentally for an OPO [Z.Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H.J. Kimble, and K.C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett 68, 3663 (1992)]. The quantities measured in the experiment are the spectral components of the quadrature-phase amplitudes (phase and intensity) of the signal and idler beams.
15. M. H. Rubin, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5349 (1996).
16. M. H. Rubin, quant-ph/0303188.
17. A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, and L. A. Lugiato, Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 133603 (2003)
18. D. Bedford and F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 42, 325 (1985); M.J. Collet and R. Loudon, Nature (London) 326, 671 (1987).
19. D. Bedford and F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 42, 325 (1985); M.J. Collet and R. Loudon, Nature (London) 326, 671 (1987).
20. Y.-H. Kim and Y.H. Shih, Found Phys. 29, 1849 (1999).
21. Cancellation of first order effects is a prerequisite for making this distinction since quantum ghost interference-imaging phenomena are second order effects. Also, two independent measurements are required: one in momentum space (Fourier transform plane) and another one in position space (image plane).