The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems onmicroleakage of tooth colored restorations

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-10

  Owens, Barry M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Compomer; Composite resin; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHYLENE BLUE;

AIR DRYING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DESICCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ORTHODONTICS; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SPONGE APPLICATOR DRYING; STAINING; TOOTH FILLING;

EID: 3242710406     PISSN: 15263711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-4-1-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: An introduction text for selecting, placing and finishing direct systems. Santa Rosa: Alto Books, 1996; 6a-1-6a-9.
2. Jordan RE, Croll TP. Resin-Enamel bonding. In: Esthetic Composite Bonding: Techniques and Materials. 2nd ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 1993; 24.
3. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, et al. Characterization of first generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 May;129(5):567-77.
4. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. Dentin Adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites. Am J Dent. 1992 Oct;5(5):240-4.
5. Nelson R, Wolcott R, Paffenbarger G. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-295.
6. Davidson CL, DeGee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984 Dec;63(12):1396-9.
7. Asmussen E. The effect of temperature change on adaptation of fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32(3):161-71. No abstract available.
8. Ballard RH, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:871-874.
9. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 May;124(5):26-36. Review.
10. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M. Contraction under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent. 1988 Winter;13(1):24-31. No abstract available.
11. Hansen EK, Asmusson E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater. 1989 Mar;5(2):122-6.
12. Ben-Amar A. Microleakage of composite resin restorations: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1989 Aug;2(4):175-80. Review. No abstract available.
13. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):306-35. Review.
14. Charlton DG. Dentin bonding: past and present. Gen Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;44(6):498-507; quiz 515-6. Review.
15. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-853.
16. Kanca J. Microleakage of five dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1989 Nov;5(6):415-6.
17. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Cloe BC. Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):61-4.
18. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):90-5.
19. Summitt JB, Chan DCN, Dutton FB, et al. Effect of rinse time on microleakage between composite and etched enamel. Oper Dent. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):37-40.
20. Pashley DH. Smear layer: Physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl. 1984;3:13-29. No abstract available.
21. Brannstrom M. Smear layer: Pathological and treatment considerations. Oper dent 1984 (Supplement 3):35-42.
22. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesive used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent. 2000 Apr;13(2):93-7.
23. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimento LA, et al. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):31-33.
24. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microle-akage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):132-6.
25. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):209-13.
26. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AHL Liu P. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1996 Dec;9(6):245-8.
27. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, et al. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1999 Dec;12(6):291-4.
28. Pontes DG, DeMelo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):136-9.
29. Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):19-24.
30. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, et al. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interface microleakage. Am J Dent. 2001 Dec;14(6):344-8.
31. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, et al. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):262-71.
32. Smales RJ. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J. 1993 May 8;174(9):330-3.
33. Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jul;119(1):141-4.
34. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-85. Review. No abstract available.
35. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Duschner H, Garcia-Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the Composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):252-8. Review.