Semantic knowledge in word completion

ASSETS 2005 - The Seventh International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 121-128

  Li, Jianhua ^a   Hirst, Graeme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Linguistic semantics; Pointwise mutual information; Word completion

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LINGUISTIC DISABILITIES; LINGUISTIC SEMANTICS; POINTWISE MUTUAL INFORMATION; WORD COMPLETION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 32344449613     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1090785.1090809     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Budanitsky, A. and Hirst, G. Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. Workshop on WordNet and other Lexical Resources, Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2001), 29-34.
2. Co:Writer4000. Available at www.donjohnston.com/catalog/cow4000d.htm.
3. Even-Zohar, Y., and Roth, D. A classification approach to word prediction. Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL) (2000), 124-131.
4. Fazly, A. and Hirst, G. Testing the efficacy of part-of-speech information in word completion. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Modeling for Text Entry Methods, 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2003), 9-16.
5. Foster, G., Isabelle, P., and Plamondon, P. Target-text mediated interactive machine translation. Machine Translation (1997), 12:175-194.
6. Foster, G., Langlais, P., and Lapalme, G. User-friendly text prediction for translators. Proceedings of the conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2002), 148-155.
7. Garay-Vitoria, N. and Abascal, J. A comparison of prediction techniques to enhance the communication rate. In C. Stary and C. Stephanidis (eds.), User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3196, Springer-Verlag (2004), 400-417.
8. Goodman, J., Venolia, G., Steury, K., Parker, C. Language modeling for soft keyboards. Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2002), 419-424.
9. Hsiao, J.H. A split model to deal with semantic anomalies in the task of word prediction. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2003).
10. Hsiao, J.H. Dealing with Semantic Anomalies in a Connectionist Network for Word Prediction. Master's thesis, Simon Fraser University (2002).
11. Hunnicutt, S. Using syntactic and semantic information in a word prediction aid. Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (1989), 191-193.
12. Jeong, M., Kim, B., Lee, G.G. Using higher-level linguistic knowledge for speech recognition error correction in a spoken Q/A dialog. HLT-NMCL 2004 Workshop on Spoken Language Understanding for Conversational Systems and Higher Level Linguistic Information for Speech Processing (2004).
13. Klarlund, N. and Riley, M. Word n-grams for cluster keyboards. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Modeling for Text Entry Methods, 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2003), 51-58.
14. Kozima, H., and Ito A. A scene-based model of word prediction. Available at citeseer.ist.psu.edu/97151.html.
15. Lesk, M. Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from a ice cream cone. Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC'86), Toronto (1986), 24-26.
16. Manning, C., and Schütze, H. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1999).
17. McCoy, K.F., Pennington, C.A., and Badman, A.L. A communication aid with artificial intelligence: Communic-ease meets semantic parsing. Proceedings of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)'97 20th Annual Conference (1997).
18. McCoy, K.F., Pennington, C.A., and Badman, A.L. Compansion: From research prototype to practical integration and alternative communication. Natural Language Engineering (1998), 4(1): 73-95.
19. Mohammad, S. and Hirst, G. Distributional measures as proxies for semantic relatedness. Submitted for publication (2005). Available at www.cs.toronto.edu/compling/Publications/
20. Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S., and Pedersen, T. Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (2003).
21. Renaud, A. Diagnostic evaluation measures for improving performance of word prediction systems. M.Math thesis, University of Waterloo (2002).
22. Rosenfeld, R. A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language modeling. Computer, Speech and Language (1996), 10:187-228.
23. T9. The easiest way to enter text on a mobile phone. Available at www.f9.com.
24. Weeds, J. Measures and applications of lexical distributional similarity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex (2003).
25. Wood, M.E.J, and Lewis, E. Windmill - The use of a parsing algorithm to produce predictions for disabled persons. Proceedings of the 1996 Autumn Conference on Speech and Hearing (1996), 18(9): 315-322.
26. WordQ. Writing Aid Software. Available at www.wordq.com.