A classification approach to word prediction

1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2000 - co-located with 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, ANLP 2000 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 124-131

  Even Zohar, Yair ^a   Roth, Dan ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ATTENTION MECHANISMS; CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; CONTEXT REPRESENTATION; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; FOCUS OF ATTENTION; LANGUAGE MODEL; LEARN+; LEARNING METHODS; WORD PREDICTION; WORD REPRESENTATIONS;

FORECASTING;

EID: 85119672471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Berger and H. Printz. 1998. Recognition performance of a large-scale dependency-grammar language model. In Int'l Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'98), Sydney, Australia.
2. A. Blum. 1992. Learning boolean functions in an infinite attribute space. Machine Learning, 9 (4) :373-386.
3. E. Brill. 1995. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part of speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21 (4) :543-565.
4. C. Chelba and F. Jelinek. 1998. Exploiting syntactic structure for language modeling. In COLING-ACL'98.
5. C. Cumby and D. Roth. 2000. Relational representations that facilitate learning. In Proc. of the International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. To appear.
6. I. Dagan, L. Lee, and F. Pereira. 1999. Similaritybased models of word cooccurrence probabilities. Machine Learning, 34 (l-3) :43-69.
7. A. R. Golding and D. Roth. 1999. A Winnow based approach to context-sensitive spelling correction. Machine Learning, 34 (1-3) :107-130. Special Issue on Machine Learning and Natural Language.
8. F. Jelinek. 1998. Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition. MIT Press.
9. D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin. 200. Speech and Language Processing. Prentice Hall.
10. L. Lee and F. Pereira. 1999. Distributional similarity models: Clustering vs. nearest neighbors. In ACL 99, pages 33-40.
11. L. Lee. 1999. Measure of distributional similarity. In ACL 99, pages 25-32.
12. N. Littlestone. 1988. Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Machine Learning, 2:285-318.
13. M. Munoz, V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and D. Zimak. 1999. A learning approach to shallow parsing. In EMNLP-VLC'99, the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, June.
14. A. Ratnaparkhi, J. Reynar, and S. Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. In ARPA, Plainsboro, NJ, March.
15. R. Rosenfeld. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language modeling. Computer, Speech and Language, 10.
16. D. Roth and D. Zelenko. 1998. Part of speech tagging using a network of linear separators. In COLING-ACL 98, The 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1136-1142.
17. D. Roth. 1998. Learning to resolve natural language ambiguities: A unified approach. In Proc. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 806-813.
18. D. Roth. 1999. Learning in natural language. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence, pages 898-904.
19. P. Tapanainen and T. Jrvinen. 1997. A nonprojective dependency parser. In In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Washington DC.
20. D. Yarowsky. 1994. Decision lists for lexical ambiguity resolution: application to accent restoration in Spanish and French. In Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 88-95.
21. D. Yuret. 1998. Discovery of Linguistic Relations Using Lexical Attraction. Ph. D. thesis, MIT.