Optimal financial-market integration and security design

Journal of Business

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 2397-2433

  Acharya, Viral V ^a   Bisin, Alberto ^b  

^a CEPR   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32144450982     PISSN: 00219398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/497041     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alesina, A., R. J. Barro, and S. Tenreyro. 2002. Optimal currency areas. Working paper 9072, National Bureau of Ecenomic Research, Cambridge, MA.
2. Alesina, A., E. Spolaore, and S. Wacziarg. 2000. Economic integration and political disintegration. American Economic Review 90:1276-96.
3. Allen, F., and D. Gale. 1994. Financial innovation and risk sharing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Athanasoulis, S., and R. Shiller. 2000. The significance of the market portfolio. Review of Financial Studies 13:301-29.
5. _. 2001. World income components: Measuring and exploiting risk-sharing opportunities. American Economic Review 91, no. 4:1031-54.
6. Bettzuge, M., and T. Hens. 2000. An evolutionary approach to financial innovation. Working paper, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Universitat Zurich.
7. Bisin, A. 1998. General equilibrium with endogenously incomplete financial markets. Journal of Economic Theory 82:19-45.
8. Black, D. 1986. Success and failure of futures contracts: Theory and empirical evidence. Monograph Series in Finance and Economics. Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, New York University, Monograph 1986-1.
9. Blume, M., and I. Friend. 1975. The demand for risky assets. American Economic Review 65:900-22.
10. Blume, M., and S. Zeldes. 1993. The structure of stock ownership in the U.S. Manuscript, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
11. Boot, A., and A. Thakor, A. 1993. Security design. Journal of Finance 48:1349-78.
12. Bris, A., Y. Koskinen, and M. Nilsson. 2002. The euro is good after all: Corporate evidence. Working paper no. 02-26, International Finance Corporation, Yale University. Cappon, A. 1997. The future of futures exchanges. New York: The CBM Group, Inc.
13. _. 1998. Reinventing exchanges. New York: The CBM Group, Inc.
14. Ching, S., and M. B. Devereux. 2000. Risk sharing and the theory of optimal currency areas: A re-examination of Mundell 1973. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
15. Cuny, C. J. 1993. The role of liquidity in futures market innovations. Review of Financial Studies 6:57-78.
16. Danthine, J., F. Giavazzi, and E. von Thadden. 2000. European financial markets after EMU: A first assessment. Discussion paper no. 2413, Center for Economic Policy Research. London.
17. Davis, S., J. Nalewaik, and P. Willen. 2001. On the gains to international trade in risky financial assets. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
18. Demange, G., and G. Laroque. 1995. Optimally of incomplete markets. Journal of Economic Theory 65:218-32.
19. DeMarzo, P. 1999. The pooling and tranching of securities. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley.
20. Dixit. A. K., and V. Norman. 1989. Theory of international trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dow, J. 1998. Arbitrage, hedging, and financial innovation. Review of Financial Studies 11:739-55.
22. Duffie, D., and P. DeMarzo. 1999. A liquidity-based model of security design. Econometrica 67:65-99.
23. Duffie, D., and M. Jackson. 1989. Optimal innovation of futures contracts. Review of Financial Studies 2:275-96.
24. Duffie, D., and R. Rahi. Financial market innovation and security design. Journal of Economic Theory 65:1-42.
25. Europarl Report. 1999. Briefing No 34: Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and enlargement. European Parliament. Luxembourg.
26. French, K., and J. Poterba. 1991. Investor diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Review 81:222-26.
27. Glaeser, E., and H. Kallal. 1997. Thin markets, asymmetric information, and mortgagebacked securities. Journal of Financial Intermediation 6:64-86.
28. Hara, C. 1997. A sequence of Pareto-improving financial innovations. Working paper. Churchill College, Cambridge University.
29. Hardouvelis, G., D. Malliaropoulos, and R. Priestley. 2000. EMU and European stock market integration. Discussion paper no. 2124, Center for Economic Policy Research. London.
30. Her Majesty's Treasury. 2003a. EMU and the cost of capital. London: H.M. Treasury Public Enquiry Unit.
31. _. 2003b. Government policy on EMU and the five economic tests: Executive summary. London: H.M. Treasury Public Enquiry Unit.
32. Helpman, E., and A. Razin. 1982. A comparison of exchange rate regimes in the presence of imperfect capital markets. International Economic Review 23, no. 2:365-88.
33. Kang, J., and R. Stulz. 1997. Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 46:3-28.
34. Kendall, L., and M. J. Fishman. 1988. A primer on securitization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Lewis, K. 1999. Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. Journal of Economic Literature 37:571-608.
36. Madan, D., and B. Soubra. 1991. Design and marketing of financial products. Review of Financial Studies 4:361-84.
37. Mankiw, N., and S. Zeldes. 1991. The consumption of stockholders and non-stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 29:97-112.
38. Mann, C. L., and E. E. Meade. 2002. Home bias, transaction costs, and prospects for the Euro: A more detailed analysis. Working paper, London School of Economics and Political Science.
39. McAndrews, J., and C. Stefanadis. 2002. The consolidation of European stock exchanges. Current Issues in Economics and Finance 8, no. 6:1-11.
40. Melamed, L. 2002. Futures exchanges in a changed world order. Derivatives Special Report. Profit and Loss: Digital FX, 4th quarter, http://www. leomelamed.com/speeches/02-china.htm.
41. Nachman, D., and T. Noe. 1994. Optimal design of securities under asymmetric information. Review of Financial Studies 7:1-44.
42. Naik, N., and P. Yadav. 1999. The effects of market reform on trading costs of public investors: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Working paper, Institute of Finance and Accounting, London Business School.
43. Neumeyer, P. A. 1998. Currencies and the allocation of risk: The welfare effects of a monetary union. American Economic Review 88:246-59.
44. Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. 2002. Global implications of self-oriented national monetary rules. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117:503-36.
45. Pesendorfer, W. 1995. Financial innovation in a general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Theory 65:79-116.
46. Ross, S. 1989. Institutional markets, financial marketing, and financial innovation. Journal of Finance 44:541-56.
47. Silber, W. 1981. Innovation, competition, and new contract design in futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets 1, no. 2:123-55.
48. Sutherland, A. 2003. International monetary policy coordination and financial market integration. Working paper, Center for Economic Policy Research. London.
49. Tufano, P. 1989. Financial innovation and first-mover advantages. Journal of Finance 25:213-40.
50. Wei, S. 1996. Intra-national versus international trade. How stubborn are nations in global integration? Working paper 5531, National Bureau of Ecenomic Research, Cambridge, MA.
51. Willen, P. 1997. Some notes on CAPM. Mimeo, Princeton University.
52. _. 1999. Distribution of welfare effects of new financial markets. Working paper, Princeton University.
53. Wincoop, E. 1994. Welfare gains from international risksharing. Journal of Monetary Economics 34:175-200.